- 12 August 2022. 1 We have heard Mr Arvind P Datar, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr Somasekhar Sundaram, counsel for the respondent. CA 4905/2022 2 It is common ground between the counsel that the decision of a two-Judge Bench of this Court in Civil Appeal No 563 of 2020 where judgment has been reserved, will
- 31 October 2022. 1 Rejoinder affidavit be filed within a period of two weeks. 2 List the appeal on a non-miscellaneous day on 16 November 2022.
- 21 November 2023. 1 In view of the letter circulated by the counsel on behalf of the appellant for filing rejoinder affidavit, list the Civil Appeals on 12 December 2023.
- 8 April 2025. List on 06.05.2025.
- 6 May 2025. 1. The parties have exchanged the questions which would arise for consideration in the present appeals, which read as under: “1. Whether, the Hon'ble SAT grossly erred in completely ignoring the Explanation as also the Note while recording its finding in Para 12 of the impugned order?
- 7 August 2025. 1. Even though the matter was heard for some time, request for adjournment is made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant in C.A. No. 4905/2022 on the ground of marriage in immediate family, list both the matters on 03.09.2025.
- 3 September 2025. List on 10.09.2025.
- 10 September 2025. 1. Respondents have filed certain documents/counter affidavit. Let the petitioner(s) respond by way of rejoinder or filing additional documents within a period of one week from today.
- 24 September 2025. List on 07.10.2025.
- 7 October 2025. List on 11.11.025 (high up on the board).
- 11 November 2025. List on 19.11.2025 (Top of the Board).
- 19 November 2025. List the matter on 27.11.2025.
- 27 November 2025. 1. We have heard learned senior counsel/counsel appearing for the respective parties. 2. Arguments concluded.
- 12 May 2026. 1. Further heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the parties to file their fresh written submissions dealing with all aspects which we have discussed.
- 26 May 2026. 1. Heard learned senior counsel/ learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Arguments concluded.
- 11 August 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 11 August 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Arvind P. Datar, Mr. Pratap Venugopal, Ms. Surekha Raman, Mr. Rahul Unnikrishnan, Mr. Akhil Abraham Roy, Mr. Vijay Valsan, Mr. Dileep P., Mr. Abhishek Anand, Ms. Unnimaya S., Mr. Shreyash Kumar, Mr. Amarjit Singh Bedi, Mr. Varun Chandoik Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Somasekhar Sundaresan, Mr. Ankit Lohia, Ms. Prachi Raval, Ms. Meghna Rao, Ms. Pallavi Pratap, Ms. Meghna Rau, Ms. Ryan Karani, Ms. Malvika Kapila, Ms. Tanwangi Shukla, Mr. Ravichandra S. Hegde, Ms. Apoorva Jain, Mr. Aadhar Nautiyal
