- 15 September 2017. Issue notice. (SWETA DHYANI) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
- 24 November 2017. In view of the letter circulated on behalf of the alleged contemnor Nos. 3 and 4 seeking time for filing reply to the contempt petition, list the matter after four weeks. Permission is granted to file amended memo of parties, in the meantime.
- 23 February 2018. According to learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, 67 Companies have paid the requisite penalty and the remaining companies have not apparently paid. Insofar as the 67 Companies which have paid are concerned, they are discharged from these petitions.
- 19 November 2018. Perused the Office Report for directions dated Delay in filing the application for substituted service is condoned.
- 11 February 2019. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment for four weeks, the matters are adjourned for four weeks.
- 16 April 2019. Fresh public notice be issued in terms of prayer (a) of The petition to come up on 11.07.2019. The publication to specify the fact that the matter will be heard in the Supreme Court on 11.07.2019.
- 11 July 2019. Liberty is granted to re-publish the notice in Navbharat newspaper, Mumbai as well as the other two newspapers i.e. Hindustan Times and Maharashtra Times.
- 19 September 2019. By our order dated 26.10.2016, the appellants were to deposit the penalty amount along with costs quantified at Rs.5 lakhs each with the SEBI forthwith, and in any case, within two weeks from the aforesaid date. Finally, this order has been complied with by 69 companies. As per our order dated 11.07.2019, Shri C.U. Sin
- 18 October 2019. Pursuant to our order dated 19.09.2019, SEBI has issued the necessary advertisement in Nav Bharat (Hindi) and Hindustan Times (English) on 26.09.2019 and Maharashtra Times (Marathi) on 27.09.2019. Despite this, insofar as the remaining Companies are concerned, nobody has come forward to pay the amount of penalty as has
- 18 November 2019. List after four weeks.
- 18 December 2019. Perused the office report. None of the Directors have been found at the stated addresses after NBWs have been issued. The police authorities to search for them and find them out. A detailed report be given by the authorities to this Court on what steps have been made in this behalf within a period of four weeks from to
- 17 January 2020. The Commissioner of Police to be served again by the Registry with the two orders of this Court dated 18.10.2019 and 18.12.2019. After service is effected, the Commissioner of Police is given a period of two weeks within which to file the requisite report as a last opportunity.
- 20 February 2020. Non-bailable warrants stand discharged against Contemnor Nos. 3 and 4 in view of the fact that payment has been made by the companies concerned albeit under protest. Consequently, Contemnor Nos. 3 and 4 stand discharged from the contempt petitions.
- 17 March 2020. This is an application on behalf of respondent No.97 – Vivek Pandurang Narwankar for cancellation of non-bailable warrants issued by this Court vide order dated 18.10.2019. Conmt.Pet.(C)Nos.1684-1691/17 2 Respondent No.97 – Vivek Pandurang Narwankar is liable to pay Rs.5,00,000/- as costs imposed by this Court vide ord
- 8 April 2020. IA No. 48222/2020 - EXTENSION OF TIME The Court convened through video conferencing. Extension of 90 days' as prayed is allowed.
- 16 June 2020. IA 52364/2020: By our order dated 08.04.2020, the respondent, who was similarly situate to the applicant, was allowed the following relief:
- 19 August 2020. IA No. 76402/2020 in Contempt Petition (C) Nos. 1684-1691/2017 in Having heard learned counsel for the applicant/Respondent No.97, we are inclined, given the present situation, to grant a further period of three months from today, as a last extension, within which to do the needful after which no further extension of t
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Arvind P. Datar, Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Mrs. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Mr. B.N. Dubey, Mr. C. U. Singh, Mr. C.U. Singh, Ms. Aparna Trivedi, Mr. C.U.Singh, Mr. Dhaval Mehrotra, Mr. Sudhanshu Sikka, Mr. J.K. Ashar, Mr. Chander Uday Singh Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Vibha Dutta Makhija, Mr. Akshat Shrivastava, Mrs. Vibha Datta Makhija, Mr. Sarbajit Dutta, Ms. Pooja Shrivastava, Mr. R. Balasubramanium, Mr. Prashant Singh, Mr. Niteen Kumar Sinha, Mr. Pritam Biswas, Mr. Prateek Kandelwal, Mr. Sandeep Kumar Jha, Mr Adit S.Pujari
