- 12 July 2021. Leave granted. The parties will not alienate transfer of part with possession of the suit property during the pendency of the case.
- 18 February 2022. Four weeks time is granted to respondent no. 8 to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on respondent nos. 1 to 7 and 10 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
- 25 March 2022. Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 7 and 10.
- 19 January 2023. IA No.38683/2022 has been filed for deleting the name of appellant no.2 and IA No.38684/2022 has been filed for deleting the name of respondent no.9. Counsel for the applicants submits that the legal heirs of the appellant no.2 and respondent no.9 are already on record and, therefore, they need to be deleted from the c
- 17 February 2023. Despite due service on respondent nos. 1 to 7 and 10, there is no appearance. Mr. Chaitanya, Ld. Advocate prays time to file Memo of appearance/vakalatnama on behalf of State of Chhattisgarh. Two weeks time, is granted to file the same.
- 28 April 2025. 1. The delay of 1 days in filing the present petition is condoned in the facts and circumstances of the case. Accordingly, I.A. No. 102453/2025 is allowed. 2. Issue notice.
- 4 February 2026. Respondent nos. 1,2 and 8 are duly represented. Ld. counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars by 11.02.2026 with regard to service on respondent nos. 3 to 7.
- 16 March 2026. Respondent Nos.1,2 and 8 are duly represented. Ld. Advocate, Mr.Yashvardhan Shah, appearing on behalf of Mr.Ravinder Kumar Yadav, Advocate-on-record has entered appearance for respondent No.10 on whom service was complete on 19.5.2025. Time has been sought to file vakalatnama and reply. As service was complete on 19.5.
- 7 August 2026. 1. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, further time of four weeks is granted to take necessary steps to serve the unserved respondents and also to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased respondent No.9. 2. It is made clear that no further time would be granted.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Praveen Chaturvedi, Mr. Gautam Kumar Laha, Mr. Kiran Mahato, Mr. Venkatkrishna Kunduru, Ms. Prachi Mishra, Mr. Chaitanya Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Praveen Agrawal, Mr. Gautam Kumar Laha, Mr. Ramesh Chandra Tripathi, Mrs. Kiran Mahato, Ms. Prachi Mishra, Mr. Dipesh Singhal, Ms. Apurva, Mr. Venkata Krishna Kunduru, Mr Jamnesh Kumar, Mr Sanchit Guru, Mr Mayank Dubey, Mr. Abhishek Amritanshu
