- 4 August 2017. On a suggestion made by the Court, the learned senior counsel appearing on both sides have graciously submitted that being essentially a dispute between the members of the family, an attempt may be made for purchasing peace and for an amicable settlement of the disputes. The learned senior counsel appearing on both sid
- 10 October 2017. We are informed that the mediation is in progress. Therefore, post on 05.12.2017.
- 5 December 2017. List on 14.12.2017. In the meanwhile, we request the learned senior counsel appearing for the parties on both the sides to take forward the attempts they have made and see whether a settlement in the family is possible.
- 14 December 2017. The parties are present before this Court. We have requested Ms. Varuna Bhandari, learned Mediator, to assist the parties to arrive at an amicable settlement, though several other attempts have failed.
- 18 January 2018. The parties and the learned mediator are present in Court today. It is reported that after 42 years, thanks to the intervention of this Court and thanks to the efforts taken by the learned mediator, the communication between the brother and the real sisters has been resumed and the parties are in the process of taking
- 23 February 2018. Application for substitution is allowed. The parties are directed to give their respective proposals for settlement in writing.
- 12 March 2018. Application for substitution is allowed. Since the mediation has failed, we feel that the matter requires consideration.
- 17 May 2018. In both the matters numbered above, Ld. Counsel for the appellant shall within a period of two weeks file spare copy for reference of High Court. List again on 9.8.2018.
- 21 August 2018. Service is complete. Learned counsel for the parties have not filed statement of case within the prescribed period.
- 27 August 2018. Delay condoned. Issue notice.
- 12 October 2018. Issue notice in the application, returnable after four weeks.
- 11 December 2018. The office report indicates that service of notice is complete upon all the respondents but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed thus, the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
- 8 February 2019. No ground is made out to vary the order passed by this Court on 22.04.2016. The I.A. is, accordingly, dismissed.
- 6 March 2020. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 24 February 2026. IA No. 253963/2025 1. List the appeals for hearing in the week commencing 2. I.A. No.253963/2025 stands disposed of accordingly.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. R. Basant, Mr. Ajesh Kumar Shankar, Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, Ms. Pratiksha Mishra, Ms. Srishti Govil, Ms. Vaishnavi Subrahmanyam, Mr. Abhishek Bharti, Mr. Alok, Mr. Udaya Holla, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra, Mr. A. S. Bhasme, Mr. R.Basant Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Mr. A. S. Bhasme, Mr. R.Basant, Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, Mr. Ajesh K.Shankar, Ms. Prattiksha Mishra, Mr. Abishek Bharti, Ms. Vaishnavi Subrahmanyam, Mr. Arunava Mukherjee, Ms. Pallavi Sengupta, Mr. Vishwaditya Sharma, Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni
