- 12 January 2026. 1. The petitioner challenges the judgment and order dated 04-12-2019 in CRJA No.40/2016 titled “Santosh Rastogi vs. State of Uttarakhand” passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital. 2. Delay condoned.
- 16 February 2026. 1. As per the Office Report dated 13.02.2026, the original records of the Trial Court as well as the High Court have not been received yet. The Registry shall send a reminder for necessary compliance. 2. Let the Report dated 26.01.2026 of the Jail Superintendent be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
- 16 March 2026. 1. Leave granted. 2. Let the records of the Courts below be called for.
- 17 July 2026. Sole respondent is duly represented. Original records of the High Court and Trial Court have not been received.
- 18 August 2026. Sole respondent is duly represented. Scanned original records of the High Court and Trial Court have been received. Let soft copy of the same be provided to the Ld.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jain, Mr. Vivek Narayan Sharma, Mr. Adhiraj Wadhera, Mrs. Mahima Bhardwaj Kalucha, Mr. Akash Singh, Mr. Shubham Awasthi, Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Ms. Palak Kaushik, Ms. Annika Khurana, Mr. Ajay Kumar Narula Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Sharma, Mr. G.P. Mahto, Ms. Anubha Dhulia, Ms. Rachna Gandhi, Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Ms. Adrija Dutta, Ms. Bhawna Shah, Mr. Harsh Singh, Mr. Vikas Negi
