SANKARI DEBNATH AND ORS. Versus RABINDRA NARAYAN NATH AND ORS. for pre-final hearing. (C.A. 14893/2024)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 14893/2024

Case Record

C.A. 14893/2024

SANKARI DEBNATH AND ORS. Versus RABINDRA NARAYAN NATH AND ORS. for pre-final hearing.

REGISTRAR

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

9 PDF renditions· 9 distinct judicial orders· 9 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

SANKARI DEBNATH & ORS. Versus RABINDRA NARAYAN NATH & ORS.. C.A. 14893/2024 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010426332022. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 9 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 3 February 2023 to 25 February 2026.

On 3 February 2023 the order records: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Issue notice, returnable within six weeks.
On 10 April 2023 the order records: Respondent nos. 1 and 3 to 8 have filed counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks' time to take/file appropriate steps/application in respect of deceased respondent no.2.
On 16 May 2023 the order records: Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to 8 have already filed counter affidavit. Four weeks time, is granted to the petitioners, to file application for substitution to bring on record Lrs. of deceased respondent No.2 or to take appropriate steps.
On 4 August 2023 the order records: Respondent nos.1, 3 and 8 have already filed counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 3 to 8 submis that vakalatnama would also be filed on behalf of Lrs. of deceased respondent no.2 today itself.
On 17 August 2023 the order records: Despite due service on respondent nos.9 to 12, there is no appearance. Respondent nos.1 and 3 to 8 have already filed counter affidavit.
On 9 October 2023 the order records: Service is complete upon the proposed legal representatives of deceased respondent No.2 Subject to just exceptions, delay in filing substitution is condoned and application for substitution is allowed. Amended Memo of Parties be filed within two weeks.
On 11 December 2023 the order records: Respondent nos.1, 2.1 to 2.3 and 3 to 8 have already filed counter affidavit. Despite due service on respondent nos.9 to 12, there is no appearance.
On 25 February 2026 the order records: Respondent nos.1 and 3 to 8 have filed counter affidavit. Respondent nos. 2.1 to 2.3 are duly represented.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

3 February 2023. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Issue notice, returnable within six weeks.
10 April 2023. Respondent nos. 1 and 3 to 8 have filed counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks' time to take/file appropriate steps/application in respect of deceased respondent no.2.
16 May 2023. Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to 8 have already filed counter affidavit. Four weeks time, is granted to the petitioners, to file application for substitution to bring on record Lrs. of deceased respondent No.2 or to take appropriate steps.
4 August 2023. Respondent nos.1, 3 and 8 have already filed counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 3 to 8 submis that vakalatnama would also be filed on behalf of Lrs. of deceased respondent no.2 today itself.
17 August 2023. Despite due service on respondent nos.9 to 12, there is no appearance. Respondent nos.1 and 3 to 8 have already filed counter affidavit.
9 October 2023. Service is complete upon the proposed legal representatives of deceased respondent No.2 Subject to just exceptions, delay in filing substitution is condoned and application for substitution is allowed. Amended Memo of Parties be filed within two weeks.
11 December 2023. Respondent nos.1, 2.1 to 2.3 and 3 to 8 have already filed counter affidavit. Despite due service on respondent nos.9 to 12, there is no appearance.
20 December 2024. Leave granted. Interim order granted earlier to continue until further orders.
25 February 2026. Respondent nos.1 and 3 to 8 have filed counter affidavit. Respondent nos. 2.1 to 2.3 are duly represented.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Pijush K. Roy, Ms. Kakali Roy, Ms. Ankita Sharma, Mr. Rajan K. Chourasia, Mr. Pritthish Roy, Mr. Sankari Debnath, Mr. Anand Kumar Chaurasia, Ms. Pooja Kumari, Mrs. Kakali Roy, Mr. Pranav Mishra Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Sandeep Jindal, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Dwivedi, Mr. Sandeep Kumar Dwivedi, Mr. Pulak Saha, Mr. Kisalaya Shukla, Mr. Vishweshwar Mishra, Mr. Om Prakash Vyas, Mr. Sandeep K. Dwivedi, Mr. Krrish Gupta, Ms. Megha Rawat, Ms. Ambika Shukla, Ms. Akansha Bharti

Relief Sought & Granted

On 25 February 2026 the latest order on this record says: Respondent nos.1 and 3 to 8 have filed counter affidavit. Respondent nos. 2.1 to 2.3 are duly represented.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 25 Feb 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 25 Feb 2026

Next hearing

25 Feb 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 9 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.