- 20 September 2024. Issue notice. In the meantime, there shall be stay of further proceedings in Application No.107/2024, titled as “Aman Chauhan Vs. Smt. Sanju @ Radhika”, pending before the Court of Family Court-04, Metro-01, Japur.
- 4 December 2024. Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for the petitioner, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, for issuing notice to sole respondent. It has been submitted by Ld. Counsel for the petitioner that permission be granted to serve the sole respondent through Whatsapp. Let appropriate application in the above
- 27 February 2025. Four weeks time, is granted to sole respondent to file counter affidavit. Since, Sole Respondent is duly represented, application seeking permission to serve the sole Respondent through whatsapp and concerned Family court and application seeking condonation of delay in filing the same, filed by Ld. Counsel for the peti
- 22 April 2025. Sole respondent is granted four weeks' time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has e-filed an application seeking permission to file additional facts and grounds, which is defective. Defects be cured within one week as prayed.
- 17 July 2025. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent-husband submits that the matter be referred to mediation before the Supreme Court Mediation Centre (SCMC). Learned counsel for the petitioner does not oppose but says that it will be difficult for the petitioner-wife to come to Delhi. 2. Having regard to the aforesaid,
- 18 September 2025. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties inform that in the mediation the next date fixed is 15 th October, 2025. 2. Accordingly, the matter be listed on 12 th December, 3. In the meantime, it is expected that the learned Mediator would submit his report prior to the next date.
- 5 February 2026. The matter could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. 2. However, interim order to continue till the next date of listing.
- 22 May 2026. The matter could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. 2. However, interim order to continue till the next date of listing.
- 5 August 2026. The matter could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. 2. However, interim order to continue till the next date of listing.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Satya Narayan Vashishth, Ms. Meena Kumari, Mr. Nitin Tewatia, Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, Mr. Satya Narayan Vashisth, Mr. Satyanarayn Vasistha, Ms. Laveena, Mr. Satya Narayan Vashistha, Mr. Harshit Garg, Mr. Devashish Vashisth Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Mr. Praful Shukla, Mr. Nikhil Kumar Singh, Mr. Deepak Chauhan, Ms. Sheena Taqui
