- 1 April 2010. Petitioner to cure the defect in the cause title of spare copies within a week for issuance of notice to all the respondents. List again on 7.7.2010.
- 12 July 2010. Delay condoned. Leave granted.
- 5 August 2010. List the application alongwith Civil Appeal paper book on 16.8.2010.
- 16 August 2010. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw I.A. No.1 and file appropriate application for stay seeking specific relief that he wants.
- 17 August 2010. File not received. List again on 30.8.2010.
- 8 October 2012. Issue notice. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8254 of 2009.
- 9 July 2014. What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report is that although by order dated 18th February,2014 of this Court the Ld. counsel for the appellant was given last opportunity to take Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2014.07.12 10:39:55 IST ....2 Reason: ITEM NO.8 -2 fresh ste
- 22 April 2015. File not received. List again on 11.08.2015.
- 27 April 2016. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Cause shown is sufficient. Delay of 107 da ys in filing application for substitution for bringing on record Lrs. of the deceased Respondent No.21(a) is condo ned.
- 20 February 2019. Perused the office report. Eight weeks' time is granted to do the needful, as prayed for.
- 14 October 2019. Re-notify after two weeks. (SUSHMA KUMARI BAJAJ) (PRADEEP KUMAR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
- 22 November 2019. Contesting R.No.2 had expired in the year 2010. Ld. Counsel for the appellant states that Lrs of R.No.2 have not been brought on records, as they have not been able to ascertain their details. ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.13 SECTION IX It is also stated that no one has approached the appellants for making payment for impugned d
- 31 January 2020. Delay in filing the application for setting aside abatement is condoned and the application for setting aside abatement is allowed. Delay in filing the application for substitution in respect of Respondent No. 1(i) is condoned and the application for substitution is allowed.
- 16 November 2020. Heard Ms. Aditi Pathak, learned counsel representing Mr. Jayant Mohan, Advocate on Record. Having considered the averments in the IA. No.11656 of 2015 for change of previous Advocate on Record and to allow Mr. Jayant Mohan to represent the Respondent Smt. Asha Raje Fatehsingh Rane , I deem it appropriate to allow the s
- 22 February 2021. For the reasons stated in the application for deletion of Respondent Nos. 4(ii) & 20 from the array of the parties is allowed at the risk of the petitioner.
- 1 August 2022. Four weeks time, is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner, to move an application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent no. 27. Two weeks time, is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to serve respondent nos. 31, 32, 33(a), 33(b) and 33(
- 14 September 2022. Ld. Counsel for appellants shall within a period of two weeks, as last chance comply with the terms of order dated 1.8.2022 of this Court. List again on 2.11.2022.
- 2 November 2022. As per office report, Ld. Counsel for appellant has not filed proof of service of statement of case upon Counsels for respondent Nos. 21(a) (i) to 21(a)(iv) so far. Ld. Counsel for appellants has failed to take appropriate steps in respect of Respondent N os. 2 to 7, 12(a) to 12 (c), 13 to 20, 22 to 26,31, 32, 33 (a) t
- 5 April 2023. As per the office report service of notice of lodgment is incomplete in respect of respondents No.2 to 7, 12(a) to 12(c), 13 to 20, 22 to 26, legal heirs of deceased respondent No.27, 31, 32,33(a) to 33(c), 34 and 35. Necessary steps shall be taken to complete service on the aforesaid unserved respondents within two we
- 6 May 2024. Two weeks time, is granted as a last chance to Ld. counsel for the petitioner, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to issue notice to all the unserved respondents. Two weeks time, as a last chance, is granted to Ld. counsel for petitioner to file application for substitution in respect of deceased responden
- 7 August 2024. Ld. counsel for the appellant has neither taken fresh steps nor filed fresh particulars for all unserved respondents nor filed any application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent no.27 despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Jud
- 7 March 2025. IA No. 209390/2024 IN C.A. NO.8254/2009 1. Interlocutory Application for deletion of respondent Nos.2 to 7, 12(a) to 12(c), 13 to 20, 21(b), 24 to 26, 31, 32, 33(a) to 33(c), 34 and 35 is allowed. The names of the said respondents be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the appellants. Amended memo of parti
- 16 May 2025. Despite service being complete, none has entered appearance for respondent nos.1(a) to 1(e), 8 to 11, 12(d) and 28 to 30. Respondent nos.2 to 7, 12(a) to 12(c), 13 to 20, 21(b), 24 to 26, 31, 32, 33(a) to 33(c), 34 and 35 have been deleted vide Hon'ble Judge in Chamber's order dated 07.03.2025.
- 11 August 2025. Service is complete on respondent Nos.1(a) to 1(e), 8 to 11, 12(d) and 28 to 30 but none has entered appearance. Respondent Nos.2 to 7, 12(a) to 12(c), 13 to 20, 21(b), 24 to 26, 31, 32, 33(a) to 33(c), 34 and 35 have been deleted from the array of parties in terms of Hon'ble Judge in Chambers' order dated 07.03.2025.
- 19 September 2025. Service is complete on respondent nos. 1(a) to 1(e), 8 to 11, 12(d), 22, 23 and 28 to 30 but none has entered appearance. Respondent nos. 21(a)(i) to 21(a)(iv) are duly represented.
- 11 November 2025. Service is complete on respondent nos. 1(a) to 1(e), 8 to 11, 12(d), 22, 23 and 28 to 30 but none has entered appearance. Respondent nos. 21(a)(i) to 21(a)(iv) are duly represented.
- 17 March 2026. 1. Learned counsel for the appellants, on instruction, pray for deletion of respondent No.27 from the array of parties. 2. Interlocutory Application for deletion of respondent No.27 is allowed at the wish and risk of the appellants.
- 15 May 2026. Service was complete on respondent Nos.1(a) to 1(e), 8 to 11, 12(d), 22, 23, 28, 29 & 30 (on respondent Nos.22 & 23 in the year 2025 and on the remaining respondents in the year 2011) but none has entered appearance. Respondent No.27 has been deleted from the array of parties vide Hon'ble Judge in Chambers' order dated
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Anil Kumar, Mr. Rajan Narain, Mr. Lakshmi Raman Singh, Mr. David Rao, Mr. Vijay Prakash, Mr. KH Nobin Singh, Mr. K. Nobin Singh, Mr. Subrat Deb, Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., Mr. Khwairakpam Nobin Singh, Mr. P. Soma Sundaram, Mr. M.S. Vishnu Shankar Advocates — Respondents: Mrs Sheela Goel, Mr. T. Mahipal, Ms. A. Subhashini, Mr. Ninad Laud, Mr. Jayant Mohan, Ms. Pooja Dhar, Mr. Merusagar Samantaray, Mr. Santosh Selvador, Mr. Leelesh Krishna, Mrs. Sheela Goel, Mr. Arun R. Pedneker, Mr. Hitesh Kr. Sharma
