- 28 July 2025. 1. Delay in filing is condoned. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner invited our attention to the testimony of PW-4, which is there on record as Annexure P-8, so as to contend that A1 (i.e., the petitioner) had launched an attack not on the deceased but on PW-4. Insofar as the deceased is concerned, according to the t
- 29 August 2025. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 2 September 2025. 1. On 28.07.2025, we had directed for summoning the record of the Trial Court. It appears record has not been yet to receive. In such circumstances, list this matter after four weeks. 2. In the meantime, the office shall remind the Courts below for sending the records.
- 9 October 2025. 1. Not to be deleted from the notified date i.e. 14.10.2025.
- 14 October 2025. 1. List on 29.10.2025.
- 29 October 2025. 1. The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that there were five accused. For convenience the appellant is referred to as A-1 and the rest are A-1 to A-5. The testimony as against the appellant and against A-2 to A-5 is common; and general allegations have been leveled against all. The only distinguis
- 19 March 2026. Sole respondent is duly represented. Counter affidavit, if any be filed in the meantime.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. P. Venkat Reddy, Mr. Prashant Kumar Tyagi, Mr. P.srinivas Reddy, Mr Prashant Kumar Tyagi, Mr. P.Srinivas Reddy Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Devina Sehgal, Mr. M. Srikanth Varma, Mr. Kumar Vaibhaw, Mr. Srikanth Varma Mudunuru
