SAJJAN KUMAR Versus STATE THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, [CAVEAT], JAGJIT SINGH ITEM] (Crl.A. 1642/2018)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · Crl.A. 1642/2018

Case Record

Crl.A. 1642/2018

SAJJAN KUMAR Versus STATE THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, [CAVEAT], JAGJIT SINGH ITEM]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU

Crl.A.Bail Criminal appeals Investigation

48 PDF renditions· 48 distinct judicial orders· 47 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

SAJJAN KUMAR Versus STATE THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,. Crl.A. 1642/2018 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010480882018. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 47 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 14 January 2019 to 1 September 2026.

On 14 January 2019 the order records: Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the relevant material. Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order and O.T. is granted.
On 4 March 2020 the order records: We have heard S/Shri Vikas Singh, Dushyant Dave, learned senior counsels and Shri Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General. It appears that there is a certificate by Dr. Randhir Sud, Chairman, Institute of Digestive & Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta-The Medicity, to the effect that Shri Sajjan Kumar, who is the appellan
On 3 September 2021 the order records: IA No. 100697/2021 - INTERIM BAIL We have heard learned senior counsel for the appellant and perused the record. The medical report shows that the appellant is being fully attended to and even a medical Board was constituted. His condition is stated to be stable and improving but he needs few more days of hospital trea
On 1 May 2024 the order records: On 22.04.2024, this Court had passed the following order: “IA No. 230020/2023 in Crl.A. No. 1665 1666/2019 In view of the statement made in the counter affidavit by the counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation, the appellant does not wish to press this interlocutory application.
On 12 August 2024 the order records: IA No. 154879/2024 in This interlocutory application has been filed seeking appropriate direction because application for forlough of the applicantappellant (Balwan Khokhar) has not been rejected on merits but due to directions in W.P.(Crl.)No.697/2022 of the High Court of Delhi. Having heard learned counsel for the a
On 6 January 2025 the order records: 1. The record of the trial Court is not available. Let it be called for immediately. 2. On receiving the record, soft copy of the same be supplied to learned counsel for the parties.
On 24 July 2025 the order records: 1) It is informed by learned counsel that appellant accused Mahender Yadav in SLP (Crl.) No. 3928 of 2017 and Captain Bhagmal in Diary No. 45014 of 2019 have died; however, the said fact be verified by the learned counsel for the respondent and the report of verification be made available on or before the next date.
On 1 September 2026 the order records: 1. We are informed by Mr. Salman Hashmi, learned advocate-on-record that the appellant has passed away a few days back. 2. However, he requests for some time to obtain instructions from the next of kin of the deceased-appellant as to whether they are desirous of proceeding with this appeal or not.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

14 January 2019. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the relevant material. Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order and O.T. is granted.
25 February 2019. List the matter before a Bench, wherein one of us (Sanjiv Khanna, J.) is not a member.
15 March 2019. IA No.185869/2018 in Criminal Appeal No.1642/2018 At the request of learned counsel appearing for the respondent-CBI, list the matter on 25.03.2019. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL)
25 March 2019. List the instant application for bail on 08.04.2019 before a Bench of which one of us (Hon'ble Sanjiv Khanna, J.) is not a member. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL)
8 April 2019. List on 15.04.2019.
15 April 2019. List in the first week of August, 2019.
5 August 2019. The parties agree that the matter may be heard in the summer vacation. Put up before the vacation Bench in the month of May, 2020.
25 October 2019. Delay condoned. Issue notice.
4 November 2019. Permission is granted to file lengthy list of dates. Delay condoned.
6 November 2019. Having heard Shri Vikas Singh and Shri Dushyant Dave, learned senior counsels, we are of the view that the appellant's health condition shall be examined by a Board of Doctors to be constituted by the Director, AIIMS. A Medical report shall be sent to this Court within four weeks from today.
15 January 2020. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. In the circumstances of the case, we consider it appropriate to grant parole to the appellant.
14 February 2020. List after three weeks for consideration of the Medical report of the medical board.
3 March 2020. At the request of Mr. Vikas Singh, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant, list the matter tomorrow i.e. 04.03.2020.
4 March 2020. We have heard S/Shri Vikas Singh, Dushyant Dave, learned senior counsels and Shri Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General. It appears that there is a certificate by Dr. Randhir Sud, Chairman, Institute of Digestive & Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta-The Medicity, to the effect that Shri Sajjan Kumar, who is the appellan
30 April 2020. Issue notice returnable on 11.05.2020. In the meantime, as prayed for, the respondent(s) may file reply affidavit.
13 May 2020. List the instant application for grant of bail in the month of August, 2020. In the meantime, let a copy of the report dated 11.03.2020 submitted by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, be supplied to the appellant.
22 July 2020. Issue notice on I.A. No. 59971/2020.
4 September 2020. The instant interlocutory application being IA No.48554/2020 for grant of bail is dismissed.
18 March 2021. List next week.
25 March 2021. IA No. 59971/2020 in Criminal Appeal Nos.1665-1666/2019 Put up after the ensuing Holi Holidays, 2021.
8 April 2021. List in the next week.
24 August 2021. IA No.100697/2021 - INTERIM BAIL Issue notice. Learned counsel for the State accepts notice.
25 August 2021. On mentioning, the matter was taken up. It is submitted by learned senior counsel for the appellant that the condition of the appellant is quite precarious. It is however, not disputed that he is already being medically attended to. Since there is no opposition from the opposite side, we prepone the date of hearing to
3 September 2021. IA No. 100697/2021 - INTERIM BAIL We have heard learned senior counsel for the appellant and perused the record. The medical report shows that the appellant is being fully attended to and even a medical Board was constituted. His condition is stated to be stable and improving but he needs few more days of hospital trea
3 January 2023. SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE ON IA 152830/2022 Issue notice which is accepted by learned counsel for the State. Reply be filed, as prayed, within four weeks.
3 February 2023. IA No. 152830/2022 - SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE IN Dismissed. We are informed that the matter was listed during the Summer vacations of 2022 but the counsel for the accused and the State expressed their difficulty.
21 November 2023. IA NO. 230020/2023 IN Crl.A. No. 1665-1666/2019 List on 23.11.2023 if the composition of the Bench is same as today.
11 December 2023. FOR SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE ON IA 152830/2022 IN List on 13.12.2023. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR CUM PS
15 March 2024. IA No. 230020/2023 in Crl.A.No. 1665-1666/2019 Relist on 05.04.2024. In the meantime, learned counsel appearing for the CBI may file response to the application.
5 April 2024. IA No. 230020/2023 in Counter affidavit is not on record. It be filed during the course of the day. As prayed for, relist the matter after two weeks.
The record also contains 17 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. A. Saran, Mr. Ajay Marwah, Mr. Salman Hashmi, Mr. S.A. Hashmi, Mr. Anil Sharma, Mr. Anuj Sharma, Mr. Apoorav Sharma, Mr. Mukesh Sangwan, Mr. Aman Khan, Mr. Shekhar Naphade, Mr. Amarendra Sharan, Mr. Apporav Sharma Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Dushyant Dave, Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Mrs. Prabshay Kaur, Ms. Shilpa Diwan, Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Mr. Tushar Mehta, Ms. Suhasini Sen, Ms. Shraddha Deshmukh, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Dr. Nishesh Sharma

Relief Sought & Granted

On 3 September 2021 the order records: On examination of the matter, we are not inclined to grant either medical bail , as prayed for by learned senior counsel for the petitioner. The application stands dismissed.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Bail Criminal appeals Investigation

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 1 Sept 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 1 Sept 2026

Next hearing

24 Apr 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 47 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 1 other files in the folder were left out.