- 15 September 2017. List all the applications for impleadment in Application (IA No.85980/2017 in SLP(C)No.11974-11975/2014) to correct the typographical error in application for impleadment is allowed. (OM PARKASH SHARMA) (SUMAN JAIN) AR CUM PS BRANCH OFFICER
- 1 February 2018. On mentioning, the matter is taken on Board. Let this matter not be deleted from the list.
- 6 February 2018. Delay condoned. Leave granted.
- 19 February 2018. Applications for deletion of name of proforma respondents are allowed. The name of proforma respondents be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the appellants.
- 8 March 2018. Await certificate of service in respect of respondent nos. 1,2 and 4 to 6. Reminder be issued.
- 27 March 2018. The names of pro forma respondents are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the appellants.
- 4 May 2018. IA no. 58424 of 2018 in C.A. Nos. 1788-1790 of 2018 The names of respondent no. 6 in Civil Appeal No. 1788 of 2018 and respondent nos. 5 & 6 in Civil Appeal No. 1789 of 2018 are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the appellants. IA no. 58424 of 2018 is allowed.
- 2 November 2018. This is an application for early hearing of the appeals. Let the appeals be listed in usual course.
- 23 April 2019. All matters All respondents are served/represented. Proforma respondents in C.A. No.1773-83/2018, proforma respondent nos. 5 to 9 in C.A. No.1785-86/2018, proforma respondent nos. 5 and 6 in C.A. No.1788-90/2018, proforma respondent nos. 6 to 16 in C.A. No.1791-92/2018, proforma respondent nos. 5 to 25 in C.A. No.1793-
- 18 October 2019. The present appeals being of the year 2018, no orders for early hearing thereof are required to be passed for the present. The application is accordingly dismissed.
- 5 August 2022. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Taking into consideration the averments made in the application seeking early hearing of the Civil Appeals filed by the appellants, the Registry is directed to list these appeals before the Bench dealing with service related matters after eight weeks.
- 23 February 2023. Both the appellant(s) and the State want time to enable them to take instruction. List on 23.03.2023.
- 21 August 2023. List on 27.09.2023.
- 7 December 2023. Heard Mr. Vijay Hansaria, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant(s). None, however, appears on behalf of the State of Rajasthan. In such circumstances, we adjourn the hearing of these matters for the day.
- 11 January 2024. As prayed for, relist the matters after three weeks. (NIDHI AHUJA) (VIRENDER SINGH) AR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER
- 18 July 2024. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the NCTE states that now he is no more in panel. However, Ms. Manisha T. Karia, learned standing counsel undertakes that she will seek instructions and appear on behalf of the NCTE. Simultaneously, as requested by learned counsel for the State, accommodation as prayed is allowed.
- 24 July 2024. After hearing the arguments for some time, as the relevant Rules, in complete, are not placed before us, the hearing could not be concluded. Relist the matters on 31st July, 2024, as Item No. 101.
- 1 August 2024. The matter was heard for some time. For further hearing, list on 07 th August, 2024, as part heard at Item No.102, (NIDHI AHUJA) (POOJA SHARMA) AR-cum-PS
- 21 August 2024. Ms. Manisha T. Karia has been designated as Senior Advocate; however, Ms. Shalini Chandra, learned counsel, appears and states that she will file vakalatnama during the course of the day to appear as an Advocate on Record for NCTE in this case. List the matters for hearing next week.
- 19 September 2024. At request of the learned counsel for the appellant, list the matters after three weeks. (NIDHI AHUJA) (POONAM VAID) AR-cum-PS
- 24 February 2026. IA No. 324253/2025 No ground to entertain the application for early hearing is made out. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.
- 20 August 2026. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents prays for an adjournment. 2. Indulgently, though reluctantly, we adjourn these matters making it clear that no further adjournment will be granted.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, Mr. Mukul Kumar, Mr. Brahma Kr. Pathak, Mr Brahma Kumar Pathak, Mr. Brahma Kumar Pathak, Mr Yash Karan Jain, Ms. Shalini Chandra, Mr. Abhishek Kumar Pandey, Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Ms. Kavya Jhawar, Mr. H. D. Thanvi, Mr. Nikhil Kumar Singh Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Som Raj Choudhury, Mr. Rajeev Singh, Mr. Aditya Kr. Chaudhary, Mr. Prakash Kr. Singh, Mr. S.S. Shamshery, Mr. Amit Sharma, Ms. Prachi Priyadarshini, Ms. Shikha Sandhu, Mr. Ankit Raj, Mr. Ruchi Kohli, Mr. Surya Kant, Mr. Lakshmeesh S. Kamath
