- 4 August 2023. 1. Appeals are admitted. 2. Until further orders, the operation of the impugned judgment and order shall remain stayed.
- 8 May 2024. Respondent no.1 is duly represented. Despite due service on respondent no.3, there is no appearance.
- 9 August 2024. In C.A. No. 4634/2023 Respondent No.1 is duly represented. Despite service of notice on respondent No. 3, there is no appearance.
- 27 September 2024. Respondent no. 1 is duly represented. Service is complete on respondent no.3 but none has entered appearance.
- 25 November 2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) prays for two weeks' time to cure the defects. List the matters after two weeks to do the needful.
- 27 March 2025. As prayed, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to serve the unserved respondent no. 2 by way of dasti service. Service is made returnable after four weeks.
- 18 August 2025. CA No.4634/2023 Respondent no. 1 is duly represented. Service is complete on respondent nos. 2 and 3 but none has entered appearance.
- 19 September 2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks four weeks time to cure the defects as pointed out by the Registry. Time, as prayed for, is granted.
- 2 December 2025. 1. Learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted four weeks' time to take steps in respect of deceased respondent No.3. 2. List after four weeks.
- 9 January 2026. Learned counsel for the appellants seeks four weeks' time stating that within such time he will take necessary steps to bring on record the heirs and legal representatives of deceased respondent No.3 in C.A. No.4635/2023. Time, as prayed for, is granted.
- 10 August 2026. 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that respondent no. 3 is expired during the pendency of the proceedings before the High Court, hence, the present proceedings against him is abated. He prays for time to file appropriate application for deletion of respondent no. 3 from the array of parties.
- 24 August 2026. 1. Heard on I.A. No. 242552/2026. 2. For the reasons assigned in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, the application seeking deletion of name of respondent no. 3 in C.A. No. 4635/2026 is allowed at the risk and consequences of the appellant.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. P. Vishwanatha Shetty, Mr. Mahesh Thakur, Ms. Deepika Lahiri, Mr. Shivamm Sharrma, Mrs. Geetanjali Bedi, Mr. Ranvijay Singh Chandel, Mrs. Vipasha Singh, Ms. Anusha, Ms. Mythili S., Ms. Geetanjali Bedi, Mr. Narveer Yadav, Mr. Siddhartha Sati Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Anirudh Sanganeria, Mr. Arijeet Shukla, Mr. Samarth Kashyap
