ROHINI RAJU KHAMKAR III KULKARNI[P-1] Versus RAJU RANBA KHAMKAR HIMANSHU SHEKHAR[R-1] (C.A. 3257/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 3257/2025

Case Record

C.A. 3257/2025

ROHINI RAJU KHAMKAR III KULKARNI[P-1] Versus RAJU RANBA KHAMKAR HIMANSHU SHEKHAR[R-1]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay Matrimonial Offences

22 PDF renditions· 22 distinct judicial orders· 22 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

ROHINI RAJU KHAMKAR Versus RAJU RANBA KHAMKAR. C.A. 3257/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010037642023. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 22 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 9 February 2023 to 27 February 2026.

On 9 February 2023 the order records: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Delay condoned.
On 14 December 2023 the order records: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. An ex-parte decree of divorce was granted in favour of the respondent-husband by the Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai on 17.12.2007. The petitioner-wife challenged that decree of divorce in appeal, which has been turned down by the High Court vide impugned judgment dated 12.10.2
On 13 May 2024 the order records: 1. After the mediation had failed, the respondent-husband was directed by us on 26.02.2024, to pay all the arrears of maintenance to the petitioner-wife within four weeks and file a Compliance Affidavit. The respondent-husband did not comply with that order. Learned counsel for the respondent-husband made a statement o
On 29 July 2024 the order records: 1. The Registry is directed to delete the name of Ms. Rohini Wagh, learned Advocate on Record, who was representing the respondent earlier as she already stands discharged from the matter on 10th April, 2024. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-husband states that the directions regarding payment of arrears of mainte
On 9 December 2024 the order records: 1. Learned counsel for the respondent-husband submits that all the arrears, in terms of order dated 13.05.2024, have been paid to the petitioner-wife except balance of Rs.80,000/- (Rupees Eighty Thousand). He submits that the balance amount shall be paid by the respondent-husband to the petitioner-wife within ten days.
On 21 February 2025 the order records: 1. It is not in dispute that the respondent-husband has finally paid a sum of Rs.5,10,000/- towards the arrears of maintenance. The petitioner however claim some arrears toward alimony etc.
On 20 January 2026 the order records: 1. The only issue herein is about the permanent alimony as both the parties are living separately for decades and there is no possibility of reunion, the mediation having failed in this regard. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is ready and willing to accept a one time alimony of Rs.
On 27 February 2026 the order records: List in the month of April, 2026 for hearing. (SNEHA DAS) (NIDHI MATHUR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

9 February 2023. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Delay condoned.
20 April 2023. Upon being mentioned by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeking urgent listing of the matter, the Registry is directed to list the said matter on 10072023. (VISHAL ANAND) (PREETHI T.C.) ASTT. REGISTRARcumPS
10 July 2023. Post the matter for hearing on 04.09.2023. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
3 October 2023. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty, list the matter on 10.11.2023.
30 November 2023. Not to be deleted from the date already notified i.e. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
14 December 2023. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. An ex-parte decree of divorce was granted in favour of the respondent-husband by the Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai on 17.12.2007. The petitioner-wife challenged that decree of divorce in appeal, which has been turned down by the High Court vide impugned judgment dated 12.10.2
26 February 2024. 1. Mediation has failed. 2. Post the matter for hearing on 10.04.2024.
10 April 2024. 1. Ms. Rohini Wagh, learned AOR states that the respondent has refused to give instructions to her. As prayed for, she is discharged from the matter. The respondent, if so advised, may engage an another counsel or may appear in-person. 2. Post the matter on 13.05.2024.
13 May 2024. 1. After the mediation had failed, the respondent-husband was directed by us on 26.02.2024, to pay all the arrears of maintenance to the petitioner-wife within four weeks and file a Compliance Affidavit. The respondent-husband did not comply with that order. Learned counsel for the respondent-husband made a statement o
29 July 2024. 1. The Registry is directed to delete the name of Ms. Rohini Wagh, learned Advocate on Record, who was representing the respondent earlier as she already stands discharged from the matter on 10th April, 2024. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-husband states that the directions regarding payment of arrears of mainte
30 August 2024. 1. The respondent has filed an affidavit admitting total arrears of maintenance amounting to Rs.5,10,000/-. He has paid Rs.3,40,000/- out of that amount. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, undertakes to pay Rs.90,000/- more by 10.09.2024.
12 November 2024. List on 09.12.2024.
9 December 2024. 1. Learned counsel for the respondent-husband submits that all the arrears, in terms of order dated 13.05.2024, have been paid to the petitioner-wife except balance of Rs.80,000/- (Rupees Eighty Thousand). He submits that the balance amount shall be paid by the respondent-husband to the petitioner-wife within ten days.
21 February 2025. 1. It is not in dispute that the respondent-husband has finally paid a sum of Rs.5,10,000/- towards the arrears of maintenance. The petitioner however claim some arrears toward alimony etc.
1 May 2025. List IA No. 70824/2025 on 18.07.2025.
18 July 2025. List IA No. 70824/2025 along with civil appeal on 28.08.2025.
26 September 2025. Let the matter be listed on the tentative date shown i.e. 08.10.2025. (SNEHA DAS) (NIDHI MATHUR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
9 October 2025. List IA No. 70824/2025 after two weeks on a non-miscellaneous day. (SNEHA DAS) (NIDHI MATHUR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
3 December 2025. List in the month of January, 2026. (SNEHA DAS) (NIDHI MATHUR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
20 January 2026. 1. The only issue herein is about the permanent alimony as both the parties are living separately for decades and there is no possibility of reunion, the mediation having failed in this regard. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is ready and willing to accept a one time alimony of Rs.
25 February 2026. Let the matter be listed on the tentative date shown, i.e. 27.02.2026.
27 February 2026. List in the month of April, 2026 for hearing. (SNEHA DAS) (NIDHI MATHUR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Mr. Siddharth Chapalgaokar, Mr. Harshvardhan Suryawanshi, Dr. R. R. Deshpande, Mr. Adit Jayeshbhai Shah, Dr. R.R. Deshpande, Mr. Adit Shah, Mr. Vaibhav Y.Kulkarni, Ms. Devyani Bhatt, Mr. Nakul Patwardhan, Mr. Vaibhav, Mr. Vaibhav Yeshwant Kulkarni Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Rohini Wagh, Ms. Deeplaxmi Matwankar, Mr. Omkar Sambherao, Ms. Varsha Shetty, Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, Mr. Parth Shekhar, Mr. Shubham Singh, Mr. Mata Prasad Pathak, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Mr. Kishore Kumar Pandey, Mr. Amitabh Ranjan, Ms. Ambali Vedasen

Relief Sought & Granted

On 27 February 2026 the latest order on this record says: List in the month of April, 2026 for hearing. (SNEHA DAS) (NIDHI MATHUR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay Matrimonial Offences

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 27 Feb 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 27 Feb 2026

Next hearing

6 Jan 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 22 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.