RAVI SHANKAR No. 1486-1487/2020 Versus DILIP JAWALKAR AND ORS. VANSHAJA SHUKLA [R-2], IN C.A. No. - 1486/2020, IN C.A. No. - 1487/2020, CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION (CONMT.PET.(C) 1154/2023)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · CONMT.PET.(C) 1154/2023

Case Record

CONMT.PET.(C) 1154/2023

RAVI SHANKAR No. 1486-1487/2020 Versus DILIP JAWALKAR AND ORS. VANSHAJA SHUKLA [R-2], IN C.A. No. - 1486/2020, IN C.A. No. - 1487/2020, CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

CONMT.PET.(C)Contempt Civil Contempt Delay Revision

30 PDF renditions· 30 distinct judicial orders· 29 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

RAVI SHANKAR Versus DILIP JAWALKAR & ORS.. CONMT.PET.(C) 1154/2023 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010370092023. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 29 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 3 October 2023 to 24 April 2026.

On 3 October 2023 the order records: Application for exemption from filing official translation is allowed. Issue notice returnable in four weeks.
On 20 November 2023 the order records: An adjournment letter has been circulated by learned counsel for the respondent. Let counter affidavit be filed within three weeks.
On 29 January 2024 the order records: CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1154-1155/2023 in C.A. No. 1486-1487/2020 Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed within a period of three weeks. List on 19.02.2024.
On 5 March 2025 the order records: Heard learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner(s). Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General, is not present.
On 6 March 2025 the order records: Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General of India appearing for the State of Uttarakhand, assures this Court that the matter is under active consideration and has further informed this Court that some of the daily rated workers have already been given dearness allowances and that the case of rest of them will also t
On 1 May 2025 the order records: Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General appearing for the State of Uttarakhand and the respondent(s) has made a very candid submission before this Court stating that the Government is conscious of the subject problem, not only just for the petitioner(s), but for the entire daily wage workers of the State of Uttarak
On 16 October 2025 the order records: Having heard the learned Solicitor General, we are satisfied that substantial progress has taken place in the matters. For reporting complete compliance, we list these matters after three months.
On 24 April 2026 the order records: 1. Permission to file contempt petition is allowed. 2. Delay condoned.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

3 October 2023. Application for exemption from filing official translation is allowed. Issue notice returnable in four weeks.
20 November 2023. An adjournment letter has been circulated by learned counsel for the respondent. Let counter affidavit be filed within three weeks.
29 January 2024. CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1154-1155/2023 in C.A. No. 1486-1487/2020 Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed within a period of three weeks. List on 19.02.2024.
19 February 2024. Due to the personal difficulty of learned counsel for the petitioner, matters are adjourned. List on 18.03.2024.
18 March 2024. Learned counsel for the respondent seeks time to file counter affidavit. List on 09.04.2024.
9 April 2024. At the request of learned counsel for the respondent, list next week.
29 April 2024. Mr. R. Venkataramani, learned Attorney General presents today through video conferencing. List the matters on 22.07.2024.
22 July 2024. Mr. R. Venkatramani, learned Attorney General for India for the respondent seeks adjournment of the matters. Adjourned. List the matters on 13.08.2024.
13 August 2024. List these matters on 09.09.2024.
9 September 2024. Put up on 17.09.2024.
11 September 2024. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
13 September 2024. List on 24.09.2024.
24 September 2024. At the request of learned Attorney General of India, list on (NIRMALA NEGI) (RENU BALA GAMBHIR)
1 October 2024. List on 22.10.2024.
11 November 2024. CONMT.PET.(C) No. 36-37/2024 in C.A. No. 1486-1487/2020 List on 28.01.2025.
4 March 2025. CONMT.PET.(C) No. 36-37/2024 in C.A. No. 1486-1487/2020 This matter is scheduled to be listed on 05.03.2025. The matter shall retain its position on that date.
5 March 2025. Heard learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner(s). Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General, is not present.
6 March 2025. Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General of India appearing for the State of Uttarakhand, assures this Court that the matter is under active consideration and has further informed this Court that some of the daily rated workers have already been given dearness allowances and that the case of rest of them will also t
21 March 2025. CONMT.PET.(C) 156-157/2024 IN C.A. No. 1486-87/2020 List on 08.04.2025.
8 April 2025. List on 24.04.2025.
24 April 2025. List all the petitions together on 01.05.2025 as first case.
1 May 2025. Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General appearing for the State of Uttarakhand and the respondent(s) has made a very candid submission before this Court stating that the Government is conscious of the subject problem, not only just for the petitioner(s), but for the entire daily wage workers of the State of Uttarak
23 July 2025. Six weeks time is given to the State as it is in the process of examining the application(s) being made by the daily rated/wage worker(s) of the concerned forest division(s). List on 10.09.2025.
8 October 2025. List on 16.10.2025.
16 October 2025. Having heard the learned Solicitor General, we are satisfied that substantial progress has taken place in the matters. For reporting complete compliance, we list these matters after three months.
11 February 2026. Contempt Petition (C) Nos. 36-37 OF 2024 List on 13.03.2026 along with the main matter.
13 March 2026. At the request of learned counsel appearing for respondent(s), list the matter on 17.04.2026 for filing compliance affidavit.
17 April 2026. List on 24.04.2026.
24 April 2026. 1. Permission to file contempt petition is allowed. 2. Delay condoned.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. P. K. Dey, Mr. K. K. Joshi, Mr. Kailash Pandey, Ms. Shilpi Dey Auditya, Ms. Shehla Chaudhary, Mr. Md. Anas Chaudhary, Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, Ms. Upasana Mukherjee, Mr. R. D. Pathak, Mr. Subart, Ms. Shilpi Dey Advocates — Respondents: Mr. J.K. Sethi, Ms. Namita Choudhary, Ms. Srishti Choudhary, Mr. J.k Sethi, Mr. J.K Sethi, Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Sharma, Mr. R. Venkataramani, Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Mr. Jatinder Kumar Sethi, Mr. R. Venkatramani, Mr. R.Venkataramani, Mr. Tushar Mehta

Relief Sought & Granted

On 24 April 2026 the order records: Permission to file contempt petition is allowed.

Subjects

Contempt Civil Contempt Delay Revision

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 24 Apr 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 24 Apr 2026

Final disposition

Permission to file contempt petition is allowed.

Important procedural note

Written only from 29 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 1 other files in the folder were left out.