- 2 January 2025. Delay condoned. Issue notice, returnable on 17th January, 2025.
- 17 January 2025. The only argument which appeals to us is that after this Court found that the Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (for short, “the 1995 Act”) was not implemented and a direction was given to implement the said Act, the same ought to have been implemente
- 24 February 2025. Considering the stand taken by the Union of India, the Contempt Petitions need detailed hearing. For that purpose, the Contempt Petitions shall be listed on 24 th April, 2025. Counter affidavit, if not filed earlier, may be filed within a period of four weeks from today.
- 24 July 2025. 1. In this matter multiple applications and compliance affidavits have been filed. In such circumstances, it would be appropriate that a convenience compilation comprising of applications filed from the petitioners' side complaining non compliance of this Court's Order and response/compliance affidavits filed by the re
- 4 November 2025. A full and proper convenience compilation shall be filed by the Union of India. Re-list on 11.11.2025.
- 11 November 2025. CONMT.PET.(C) No. 686/2020 in C.A. No. 1567/2017 Heard arguments advanced by Mr. Jayna Kothari, learned senior counsel, appearing for the petitioner; Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned Additional Solicitor General, appearing for respondent No. 5; and Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, learned counsel, appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 3
- 25 November 2025. Re-list this batch of matters on 10.12.2025 with the understanding that it will be taken up at 02.00 p.m. Registry shall print a 'Note' at the top of the list on the next date that the matters will be taken up at 2.00 p.m.
- 10 December 2025. Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 686/2020: 1. Our earlier order dated 25.11.2025 shall stand modified by mentioning the contempt petition correctly as Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 686/2020 in Civil Appeal No. 1567/2017.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Vidya, Dr. Sushil Balwada, Mr. Rocky Khan, Mr. Srilok Nath Rath, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Mr. Nandlal Kumar Mishra, Ms. Reena Rao, Mr. Krishnamohan K., Ms. Dania Nayyar, Mr. Chandan Kumar, Mr. Rituraj Choudhary, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Mr. Raman Yadav, Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Ms. Sonali Jain, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Mr. Amrish Kumar, Mr. Sonali Jain, Dr. N. Visakamurthy, Mr. Bhuvan Mishra
