- 31 January 2020. Issue notice on the special leave petition as also on the prayer for interim relief.
- 10 August 2021. List on 26.10.2021.
- 26 October 2021. Applications for permission to bring on record the necessary document and exemption from filing O.T. are allowed. Some of the respondents have been served but service is not complete on respondents Nos. 1, 8, 13 to 19 on various accounts. The petitioner would have to take steps for serving the said respondents.
- 8 September 2022. Respondent nos. 2, 11 and 12 are duly represented. Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent nos.
- 20 October 2022. Respondent Nos. 2, 11 and 12 are duly represented. Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 3 to 7, 9 and 10 but none has entered appearance on their behalf.
- 2 December 2022. Respondent Nos. 1, 9 and 10 are duly represented. Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 2 to 8 but none has entered appearance on their behalf.
- 17 February 2023. Respondent Nos. 1, 9 and 10 are duly represented. Despite service of notice on respondent Nos. 2 to 8, 11 to 13 and 15, there is no appearance.
- 12 April 2023. Respondent nos.1, 9 and 10 are duly represented. Despite due service on respondent nos.2 to 8, 11 to 13 and 15, there is no appearance.
- 5 July 2023. Respondent nos. 1, 9 and 10 are duly represented. Despite due service on respondent nos.2 to 8, 11 to 13 and 15, there is no appearance.
- 14 August 2023. Respondent Nos.1, 9 and 10 are duly represented. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for petitioner that Respondent No.1 has expired. Ld. Counsel seeks and is granted two weeks time to file appropriate application in this regard.
- 8 December 2023. Respondent nos.9 and 10 are duly represented. Despite due service on respondent nos.2 to 8 and 11, there is no appearance.
- 22 February 2024. The appellants in Civil Appeal No. 6499 of 2021 filed this application praying for deletion of the names of respondent Nos. 12 to 16 from the array of the parties. The plea of the appellants is accepted at their sole risk and peril, permitting the deletion as prayed for.
- 25 April 2024. Learned counsel prays for some time to verify the factual aspects and if needed, to take appropriate steps. List after six weeks.
- 1 October 2024. Learned counsel for the appellants clarifies that it is the appellant no. 1 who has expired and not respondent no.1 as was wrongly conveyed to the Court which led to the passing of the order dated 14.8.2023. It is further stated that all the legal representatives of appellant no. 1 are already on record and as such no
- 20 November 2024. Respondent nos. 1, 9 and 10 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent nos. 2 to 8 and 11 but none has entered appearance.
- 24 March 2026. IA No. 299204/2025 No case to entertain the application for early hearing is made out. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mrs. Shubhangi Tuli, Mr. Durga Dass Vashist, Ms. Thoppani Soniya, Mr. Rahul Kumar, Ms. Manisha, Mr. Nikhil Srivastava, Shri Surajprasad Shivprasad Awasthi, Ms. Tanya Agarwal, Mr. Nikhil Srivastav, Dr. Pramod Kumar Tripathy, Ms. Renu, Mr. Pramod Kumar Tripathy Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Nitin Bhardwaj, Dr. Anurag Bharadwaj, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Mr. Nisheeth Dixit
