RAMESHBHAI CHANDUBHAI PARMAR AND ORS. Versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. (C.A. 11769/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 11769/2025

Case Record

C.A. 11769/2025

RAMESHBHAI CHANDUBHAI PARMAR AND ORS. Versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

10 PDF renditions· 10 distinct judicial orders· 10 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

RAMESHBHAI CHANDUBHAI PARMAR & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.. C.A. 11769/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010047782021. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 10 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 12 March 2021 to 22 July 2026.

On 12 March 2021 the order records: Delay condoned. Issue notice.
On 12 May 2022 the order records: Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 but none has entered appearance on their behalf. However Mr. Ritesh Patil, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, Ld. Advocate-on-Record for respondent No.1.
On 11 August 2022 the order records: Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent nos . 3, 4 and 5.
On 23 April 2024 the order records: Learned counsel appearing for the State prays for and is granted four weeks' time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, shall be filed within two weeks thereafter.
On 4 February 2025 the order records: 1. At the request made on behalf of the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners the matters are adjourned for the day. 2. List after four weeks.
On 18 July 2025 the order records: Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 prays for and is granted four weeks time to file Vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, shall be filed within two weeks thereafter.
On 31 October 2025 the order records: Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have already filed counter affidavit. Service is complete on Respondent Nos. 3 and 5 but none has entered appearance.
On 22 July 2026 the order records: Issue notice on all applications returnable in three weeks. (KANCHAN CHOUHAN) (POOJA KOHLI) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

12 March 2021. Delay condoned. Issue notice.
12 May 2022. Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 but none has entered appearance on their behalf. However Mr. Ritesh Patil, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, Ld. Advocate-on-Record for respondent No.1.
11 August 2022. Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent nos . 3, 4 and 5.
23 April 2024. Learned counsel appearing for the State prays for and is granted four weeks' time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, shall be filed within two weeks thereafter.
16 December 2024. As prayed, counter affidavit shall be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder thereto shall be filed within two weeks thereafter.
4 February 2025. 1. At the request made on behalf of the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners the matters are adjourned for the day. 2. List after four weeks.
18 July 2025. Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 prays for and is granted four weeks time to file Vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, shall be filed within two weeks thereafter.
8 September 2025. Leave granted. Interim order of status quo to continue.
31 October 2025. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have already filed counter affidavit. Service is complete on Respondent Nos. 3 and 5 but none has entered appearance.
22 July 2026. Issue notice on all applications returnable in three weeks. (KANCHAN CHOUHAN) (POOJA KOHLI) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Pradhuman Gohil, Mrs. Taruna Singh Gohil, Ms. Ranu Purohit, Ms. Tanya Srivastava, Ms. Jasleen Bindra, Mr. R. Vishnu Kumar, Mr. Alapati Sahithya Krishna, Mr. Rushabh N. Kapadia, Mr. Mohit Prasad, Mr. Siddharth Singh, Mr. B.S. Patel, Mr. Chirag B. Patel Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Ritesh Patil, Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, Mr. Anuj Chaudhary, Ms. Priyal Sheth, Mr. Satyalipsu Ray, Mr. Deepak Singh, Mr. Shishir Kumar Jha, Ms. Sharmila Lenka

Relief Sought & Granted

On 22 July 2026 the latest order on this record says: Issue notice on all applications returnable in three weeks. (KANCHAN CHOUHAN) (POOJA KOHLI) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 22 Jul 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 22 Jul 2026

Next hearing

31 Oct 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 10 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.