- 4 December 2018. Delay condoned. Issue notice.
- 5 April 2019. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to all respondents shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of two weeks. List again on 27.8.2019.
- 27 August 2019. Service is complete upon respondent Nos. 1 and 3 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Respondent No. 2 has refused to accept notice sent to them by registered post. This refusal on their part constitutes proper service. But no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
- 3 June 2020. In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment, list the matter after four weeks.
- 22 March 2024. Service is complete. No one has appeared on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
- 31 July 2024. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 22 August 2025. 1. We are of the opinion that the appeal could not be maintained by the appellants/claimants since they have not filed an appeal before the High Court against the award. 2. However, since the learned counsel, who appears before us submitted that she has got the instructions only today to appear on behalf of the appella
- 26 September 2025. 1. The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order. 2. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Vimal Sinha, Mr. S.N. Parasar, Mr. Ankit, Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Sinha, Ms. Binisa Mohanty, Mr. Vimal Sinha, Ms. Binisha Mohanty, Mr. S. N. Parashar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Navin Prakash, Mr. Ved Vyas Tripathi, Mr. Manav Sharma, Ms. Padmava Shouma, Mr. Zainab Utsav Khan, Mr. Keshav, Mr. Utsav Madan, Ms. Shubhangi Tiwari, Mr. Indrajeet, Mr. Vaibhav Verma, Ms. Srishti Prakash
