- 27 October 2025. Permission to file the Special Leave Petition is granted. 2. Issue notice.
- 9 December 2025. In view of respondent no.1 not having been served, respondent no.2-State of Uttarakhand, is directed to effect service upon respondent no.1. The same shall be done within ten days from today. 2. The matter be listed on 02.02.2026.
- 6 February 2026. Pursuant to our last order dated 09.12.2025, learned counsel for respondent no.1 has appeared and prays for time to file counter affidavit. 2. Accordingly, as prayed for, the matter be listed on (SAPNA BISHT) (ANJALI PANWAR)
- 9 March 2026. At request of learned counsel for the petitioner for placing some more materials on record, list on 06.04.2026.
- 6 April 2026. Before coming to the merits, we notice the complete slackness and indifference on the part of the respondent no.2-State of Uttarakhand in matters like the present where the FIR has been lodged on 3rd March, 2022 and till date only 10 out of 39 witnesses have been examined during trial. 2. On a query made by the Court t
- 27 April 2026. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Pursuant to our order dated 06.04.2026, an affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no.2/State of Uttarakhand, in which, reasons have been given for not sending complete instructions to the counsel for assisting the Court and apology has also been tendered.
- 25 May 2026. As per the status report, which the learned counsel for the respondent no.2-State of Uttarakhand undertakes to file today itself, pursuant to the order of this Court dated 27.04.2026, four material witnesses have been examined and now only seven formal witnesses remain to be examined. This Court is not satisfied, rathe
- 3 August 2026. At the outset, the Court is informed that upon conclusion of trial, the judgment is to be delivered in the case today. 2. Having regard to the aforesaid, list the matter on 05.08.2026 at the top of the board.
- 5 August 2026. As jointly prayed for, list on 11.08.2026.
- 11 August 2026. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. At the outset, we are informed that the trial has finally concluded resulting in conviction and sentencing of the respondent no.1.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Aviral Kashyap, Mr. Amit Singh, Mr. Prabhsharan Singh Mohi, Ms. Smriti Parija, Ms. Amrita Rai, Mr. Amit Kr. Singh, Mr. Mithilesh Kr. Pandey, Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Mr. Arvind Kumar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Manan Verma, Ms. Anubha Dhulia, Mr. Sumit Kumar, Mr. Pranjal Tandon, Ms. Mansi Diwakar, Mr. Narender Singh, Mr. Niteen Kumar Sinha, Mr. Dushyant Pratap Singh, Mr. Chaitanya Kamal, Mr. Aman Gaur, Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Mr. Amar Gaur
