RAJKUMAR AGARWAL Versus VEHICLE TATA VENTURE NO. UP 70 BM 1600COMMERCIAL AUTO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED THR. ITS DIRECTOR SANSKAR GUPTA AND ORS. Only SLP (C) NOs. 19419/2023 & 19422/2023 are to be listed. (C.A. 4941/2022)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 4941/2022

Case Record

C.A. 4941/2022

RAJKUMAR AGARWAL Versus VEHICLE TATA VENTURE NO. UP 70 BM 1600COMMERCIAL AUTO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED THR. ITS DIRECTOR SANSKAR GUPTA AND ORS. Only SLP (C) NOs. 19419/2023 & 19422/2023 are to be listed.

MS. GRACY L. BAWITLUNG

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Taxation

17 PDF renditions· 17 distinct judicial orders· 15 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

RAJKUMAR AGARWAL Versus VEHICLE TATA VENTURE NO. UP 70 BM 1600COMMERCIAL AUTO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED THR. ITS DIRECTOR SANSKAR GUPTA & ORS.. C.A. 4941/2022 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010144852021. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 15 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 22 July 2021 to 13 August 2026.

On 22 July 2021 the order records: Applications for exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment, exemption from filing O.T. are allowed.
On 13 May 2022 the order records: Upon being mentioned by Mr. Rajiv Tyagi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, we deem it appropriate to direct the Registry not to delete the matter from the date, if any, already notified. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (R.S. NARAYANAN) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
On 16 May 2023 the order records: Issue notice. Tag along with Civil Appeal No. 4941/2022.
On 23 July 2024 the order records: Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. Counsel for the petitioner, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to issue notice to Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Despite service of notice on respondent Nos. 5 and 6, there is no appearance on their behalf.
On 9 September 2024 the order records: Office report has not been uploaded. List again on 12.09.2024.
On 1 April 2025 the order records: Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have filed counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent No.3 but none has entered appearance.
On 22 July 2026 the order records: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has neither taken steps nor file fresh particulars in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 4 in terms of the order dated 22.08.2025. 2. Four weeks time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to do the needful failing which the petition qua respondent nos. 1 to 4 shall stand di
On 13 August 2026 the order records: Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file fresh particulars of respondent no. 1 and to file spare copies in respect of both the respondents by 20.08.2026. List the matter again before this Court on 18.09.2026.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

22 July 2021. Applications for exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment, exemption from filing O.T. are allowed.
18 February 2022. Counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks time to take fresh steps in respect of respondent no. 3. Dasti, in addition is permitted.
25 March 2022. Counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2. Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent no.
13 May 2022. Upon being mentioned by Mr. Rajiv Tyagi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, we deem it appropriate to direct the Registry not to delete the matter from the date, if any, already notified. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (R.S. NARAYANAN) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
26 July 2022. Leave granted. List on the week commencing 20th September, 2022.
19 October 2022. As prayed, list this matter in the week commencing 21.11.2022.
23 November 2022. List the matter on 10th January, 2023. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) AR-CUM-PS
19 January 2023. The Registry to place the matter before Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India to refer the matter to a Bench of an appropriate strength for authoritative pronouncement on the aspect in terms of signed order.
16 May 2023. Issue notice. Tag along with Civil Appeal No. 4941/2022.
23 July 2024. Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. Counsel for the petitioner, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to issue notice to Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Despite service of notice on respondent Nos. 5 and 6, there is no appearance on their behalf.
9 September 2024. Office report has not been uploaded. List again on 12.09.2024.
1 April 2025. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have filed counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent No.3 but none has entered appearance.
22 August 2025. Learned counsel for the Appellants is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps in respect of Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Learned counsel for the Appellants is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps in respect of Respondent No. 1.
22 July 2026. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has neither taken steps nor file fresh particulars in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 4 in terms of the order dated 22.08.2025. 2. Four weeks time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to do the needful failing which the petition qua respondent nos. 1 to 4 shall stand di
13 August 2026. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file fresh particulars of respondent no. 1 and to file spare copies in respect of both the respondents by 20.08.2026. List the matter again before this Court on 18.09.2026.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Rajiv Tyagi, Mr. Rohit Gupta, Mr. Rahul Tyagi, Mr. ROHIT GUPTA, Mr. RAHUL TYAGI, Mr. Ambuj Ojha, Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, Mr. Kumar Prashant, Mr. Parmod Kumar Vishnoi, Mr. Avnish Dave, Mr. Vaibhav Dwivedi, Ms. Ankita Chaudhary Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Mr. Devang Savla, Mr. Ranjan Kumar Pandey, Mr. K.K. Bhat, Mr. Divyam Garg, Mr. Avijit Dikshit, Mr. KK BHAT, Mr. K.K.Bhat, Mr. Akshat Shrivastava, Mr. Kushagra Pandey, Mr. Ved P. Singh, Ms. Ankita Gupta

Relief Sought & Granted

On 22 July 2026 the order records: Four weeks time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to do the needful failing which the petition qua respondent nos. 1 to 4 shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Taxation

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 13 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 13 Aug 2026

Next hearing

22 Jul 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 15 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 2 other files in the folder were left out.