RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AND ANR. Versus RAJAT YADAV AND ORS. AJIT KUMAR EKKA , [R-1], [ HEARD BY : HON. DIPANKAR DATTA AND HON. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JJ. ] INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT (C.A. 14112/2024)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 14112/2024

Case Record

C.A. 14112/2024

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AND ANR. Versus RAJAT YADAV AND ORS. AJIT KUMAR EKKA , [R-1], [ HEARD BY : HON. DIPANKAR DATTA AND HON. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JJ. ] INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

13 PDF renditions· 13 distinct judicial orders· 12 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ANR. Versus RAJAT YADAV & ORS.. C.A. 14112/2024 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010505162023. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 12 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 15 December 2023 to 19 December 2025.

On 15 December 2023 the order records: 1. Application seeking exemption from filing official translation is allowed. 2. Issue notice. Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, learned Advocate on Record accepts notice.
On 29 February 2024 the order records: Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.1, 5, 8 and 21, to file counter affidavit. Despite due service on respondent Nos.2 to 4, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 12 to 20, there is no appearance.
On 25 April 2024 the order records: Despite due service on respondent nos.2 to 4, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 12 to 20, there is no appearance. Respondent nos.1, 5, 8 and 21 have already filed counter affidavit.
On 29 July 2024 the order records: Respondent nos. 1, 5, 8 and 21 have already filed counter affidavit. Item no.75 Ld. Counsel for respondent no.11 submits that the said respondent wants to adopt the counter affidavit filed by respondent nos. 1,5,8 and 21. Submission is taken on record.
On 2 December 2024 the order records: 1. Leave granted. 2. Relist the appeal on 20th January, 2025.
On 15 April 2025 the order records: 1. We are informed by Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant-High Court of Rajasthan that in Civil Appeal Nos. 3957-4009 of 2025 there are more than 700 respondents and that the appellants may be permitted to serve them through e-mail. 2. Permission granted.
On 6 August 2025 the order records: 1. The appeals / petitions are heard in-part. 2. List the appeals / petitions on 13 th August, 2025 at the top of the Board.
On 13 August 2025 the order records: 1. Arguments concluded. 2. Judgment is reserved.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

15 December 2023. 1. Application seeking exemption from filing official translation is allowed. 2. Issue notice. Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, learned Advocate on Record accepts notice.
29 February 2024. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.1, 5, 8 and 21, to file counter affidavit. Despite due service on respondent Nos.2 to 4, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 12 to 20, there is no appearance.
25 April 2024. Despite due service on respondent nos.2 to 4, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 12 to 20, there is no appearance. Respondent nos.1, 5, 8 and 21 have already filed counter affidavit.
29 July 2024. Respondent nos. 1, 5, 8 and 21 have already filed counter affidavit. Item no.75 Ld. Counsel for respondent no.11 submits that the said respondent wants to adopt the counter affidavit filed by respondent nos. 1,5,8 and 21. Submission is taken on record.
25 September 2024. List on 02.12.2024.
2 December 2024. 1. Leave granted. 2. Relist the appeal on 20th January, 2025.
6 February 2025. 1. List the appeal in the month of March, 2025.
15 April 2025. 1. We are informed by Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant-High Court of Rajasthan that in Civil Appeal Nos. 3957-4009 of 2025 there are more than 700 respondents and that the appellants may be permitted to serve them through e-mail. 2. Permission granted.
6 August 2025. 1. The appeals / petitions are heard in-part. 2. List the appeals / petitions on 13 th August, 2025 at the top of the Board.
13 August 2025. 1. Arguments concluded. 2. Judgment is reserved.
19 December 2025. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
19 December 2025. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Nidesh Gupta, Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Mrs. Bihu Sharma, Mr. Mohit Prasad, Mr. Mukul Kumar, Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Mr. Sandeep Malik, Mr. Himanshu Jain, Mr. Sushil Kumar Singh, Mr. Lokdeep Mourya, Mr. Amit Advocates — Respondents: Dr. K.S. Chauhan, Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Mr. Murari Lal, Mr. S.P. Singh, Mr. Ajit Kumar, Mr. Amit, Mr. S.p. Singh, Mr. R.s.m. Kalky, Dr. K. Elumalai, Mr. Avinash Sharma, Mr. Abhishek Chauhn

Relief Sought & Granted

On 13 August 2025 the latest order on this record says: 1. Arguments concluded. 2. Judgment is reserved.

The court record marks the case disposed. These order files do not contain a sentence that states the appeal or petition was allowed or dismissed, so that result is not restated here.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 19 Dec 2025

Latest development

Latest recorded event 19 Dec 2025

Final disposition

DISPOSED

Important procedural note

Written only from 12 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 1 other files in the folder were left out.