R. LAKSHMANAN XII-B ANAND DILIP LANDGE [P-1] Versus AIR INDIA LIMITED AND ORS. (C.A. 10031/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 10031/2025

Case Record

C.A. 10031/2025

R. LAKSHMANAN XII-B ANAND DILIP LANDGE [P-1] Versus AIR INDIA LIMITED AND ORS.

REGISTRAR

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

15 PDF renditions· 15 distinct judicial orders· 14 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

R. LAKSHMANAN Versus AIR INDIA LIMITED & ORS.. C.A. 10031/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010293412022. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 14 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 25 November 2022 to 10 December 2025.

On 25 November 2022 the order records: Issue notice. In the meantime and until further orders, the operation of the judgment and order dated 22.08.2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in W.A. No. 1845 of 2022 shall remain stayed.
On 25 January 2023 the order records: Await service report in respect of respondent No.4. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks' time to take appropriate steps in respect of deceased respondent Nos.6 and 8.
On 3 March 2023 the order records: Despite due service on respondent nos.1 to 3, 5, 7, 10, 12, 15, 17 to 21, 24 and 28 to 31, there is no appearance. However, Mr. Rujesh Runyun, Ld. Advocate appearing for Mr.
On 3 October 2023 the order records: 1 IA No. 38092 of 2023 seeking deletion of Respondent Nos. 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 26 and 29 from the array of parties is not opposed by the learned counsel for the contesting respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. 2 The Application is allowed and deletion as prayed for is granted at the peril of the petitioner.
On 6 February 2024 the order records: 1. Under instructions from the petitioner, learned counsel orally prayed for and sought permission to delete the names of deceased respondent Nos.6 and 8, viz., R. Rajagopal and P.V. Mani from the array of parties. 2. Subject to just exceptions and at the risk and consequences of the petitioner, prayer is allowed.
On 11 March 2024 the order records: Respondent Nos. 4 to 11, 13, 14, 16, 19, 20, 22 to 27 and 29 have been deleted from the array of parties. Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 3, 12, 15, 17, 18, 21, 28, 30 & 31 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
On 8 July 2024 the order records: Incidentally, some of the respondents including respondent nos. 1 to 3 are yet to file counter affidavit. Counter affidavit, if any, shall be filed within a period of five weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, shall be filed within two weeks thereafter. List on 1.10.2024.
On 10 December 2025 the order records: Petition in respect of respondent nos. 4, 9, 14, 16, 25 and 27 has been dismissed vide Hon'ble Judge-in-Chamber's order dated Respondent nos. 5 to 8, 10, 11, 13, 19, 20, 22 to 24, 26 and 29 have been deleted vide Hon'ble Judge-in-Chamber's order dated 03.10.2023 and 06.02.2024. Respondent nos. 1 to 3 are duly represent

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

25 November 2022. Issue notice. In the meantime and until further orders, the operation of the judgment and order dated 22.08.2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in W.A. No. 1845 of 2022 shall remain stayed.
25 January 2023. Await service report in respect of respondent No.4. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks' time to take appropriate steps in respect of deceased respondent Nos.6 and 8.
3 March 2023. Despite due service on respondent nos.1 to 3, 5, 7, 10, 12, 15, 17 to 21, 24 and 28 to 31, there is no appearance. However, Mr. Rujesh Runyun, Ld. Advocate appearing for Mr.
3 October 2023. 1 IA No. 38092 of 2023 seeking deletion of Respondent Nos. 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 26 and 29 from the array of parties is not opposed by the learned counsel for the contesting respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. 2 The Application is allowed and deletion as prayed for is granted at the peril of the petitioner.
6 February 2024. 1. Under instructions from the petitioner, learned counsel orally prayed for and sought permission to delete the names of deceased respondent Nos.6 and 8, viz., R. Rajagopal and P.V. Mani from the array of parties. 2. Subject to just exceptions and at the risk and consequences of the petitioner, prayer is allowed.
11 March 2024. Respondent Nos. 4 to 11, 13, 14, 16, 19, 20, 22 to 27 and 29 have been deleted from the array of parties. Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 3, 12, 15, 17, 18, 21, 28, 30 & 31 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
31 May 2024. Learned counsel for the respondent-Air India Limited prays for and is granted four weeks' time to file counter affidavit. List the matters on 08.07.2024 (JAGDISH KUMAR) (RAM SUBHAG SINGH)
8 July 2024. Incidentally, some of the respondents including respondent nos. 1 to 3 are yet to file counter affidavit. Counter affidavit, if any, shall be filed within a period of five weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, shall be filed within two weeks thereafter. List on 1.10.2024.
21 January 2025. List on 25.02.2025 at 2.00P.M for disposal.
25 February 2025. List for final disposal at 2 p.m. on 22.04.2025.
22 April 2025. List next week on miscellaneous day.
2 May 2025. List on 01.08.2025.
1 August 2025. 1. Leave granted. 2. Hearing expedited.
10 December 2025. Petition in respect of respondent nos. 4, 9, 14, 16, 25 and 27 has been dismissed vide Hon'ble Judge-in-Chamber's order dated Respondent nos. 5 to 8, 10, 11, 13, 19, 20, 22 to 24, 26 and 29 have been deleted vide Hon'ble Judge-in-Chamber's order dated 03.10.2023 and 06.02.2024. Respondent nos. 1 to 3 are duly represent
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. A. Balasubramanian, Mr. L. Sriram, Mr. G. Ananda Selvam, Mr. S. Shanmugaraja, Mr. Mayilsamy K., Ms. Lakshmi Ramamurthy, Mr. Sanchit Maheshwari, Mr. G. Ananda Selvan, Mr. Mayif Samy K. Adv., Mr. D. Sreenivasan, Mr. Mayilsamy, Mr. Vasantha Kumar A. Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Rujesh Runyun, Mr. Prateek Yadav, Ms. Anjali Kumar, Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Mr. Attin Shankar Rastogi, Ms. Deeksha Arora, Ms. Deeksha, Mr. Adil Vasudeva, Ms. Fauzia Shakil, Mr. Ujjwal Sigh, Mr. Shivansh Saxena, Ms. Garima Chaudhry

Relief Sought & Granted

On 6 February 2024 the order records: Subject to just exceptions and at the risk and consequences of the petitioner, prayer is allowed.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 10 Dec 2025

Latest development

Latest recorded event 10 Dec 2025

Next hearing

10 Dec 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 14 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 1 other files in the folder were left out.