- 4 October 2024. Delay condoned. Issue notice, returnable within six weeks.
- 8 November 2024. Issue notice returnable within four weeks. In the meantime, there shall be stay of further proceedings in the F.C.O.P. no. 720 of 2024 titled as “ Colonel Kanchan Kumar (Retired) vs. Ms. Priyanka Guha ” pending before the Family Court, L.B. Nagar.
- 17 December 2024. TP(C)NO.2777/2024 Ld. counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent no.1. It is submitted by the ld. Counsel for the petitioner that permission be granted to serve the said respondent also through the concerned Family Court. Allowe
- 4 February 2025. T.P.(C) No. 2777/2024 Service report from the concerned Trial court is still awaited with regard to Respondent No.1. Let reminder be issued.
- 6 March 2025. TP(C)NO.2777/2024 Respondent nos. 2 and 3(minors) are represented by the sole petitioner-Priyanka Guha, as submitted on the last date of hearing. Await service report from Trial Court in respect of respondent no.1. Issue D.O. Letter.
- 28 March 2025. T.P.(C)NO. 2777/2024 Service report received from Trial Court stating therein that notice has been served upon Counsel for respondent no.1 i.e. on Smt. Vinitha R. Chauhan through her Junior Advocate. Hence service is complete. Ld. Counsel, Ms Alankrita Sinha appearing on behalf of Mr Navneet R, Advocate-on-record appea
- 2 May 2025. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the matters be referred for mediation. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection.
- 12 August 2025. After some arguments, learned counsel for the parties agree to go for mediation before the Supreme Court Mediation Centre (SCMC). 2. Having regard to the aforesaid, let the parties appear before the Coordinator, SCMC Committee on 02.09.2025 at 02:30 p.m.
- 18 November 2025. At the outset, we are informed that the respondent-husband has totally abused the indulgence granted by this Court for mediation, inasmuch as, under the guise of mediation, he got the execution proceedings also stayed and thus, has not been paying even what he was obliged to pay under the orders passed in G.W.O.P.No. 3
- 18 December 2025. In the first session when the case was called out, the petitioner-wife was present before the Court. However, we required the presence of the respondent-husband and the elder son, who is respondent no.2, aged fifteen years. 2. In the second session, when the case was taken up, we interacted with the parties, separately
- 7 January 2026. Today, the matter has been listed only for stock taking of what development has taken place since our last order. We are glad to be informed that there has been positive progress forward with regard to building of trust between the parties more so, the husband and the wife. It has been stated that the family, as a whol
- 21 July 2026. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By our order dated 07.01.2026, the parties appeared before the Court along with the elder son and after interacting an arrangement was made that they would live together. Today, the parties are present along with both their children.
- 23 August 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Mrinal Kanti Mandal, Mr. Thomas Oommen, Mr. K. V. Jagdishvaran, Ms. Savita Singh, Ms. Manimala Roy, Ms. Soumi K., Mr. Amresh Kumar Advocates — Respondents: Smt. Vinitha R. Chauhan, Ms Alankrita Sinha, Mr Navneet, Mr. Navneet R., Ms. Alankrita Sinha
