- 8 April 2022. In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the appellant seeking adjournment, as prayed, the matter is adjourned for two weeks.
- 29 April 2022. In view of the request made on behalf of appellant to adjourn the matter on personal ground, matter is adjourned. List after four weeks.
- 16 December 2022. Issue notice returnable within four weeks. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) AR-CUM-PS
- 24 February 2023. Despite due service on respondent nos.2, 4, 6 to 12, 14, 15 and 17, there is no appearance. At this stage, Mr. Ajay Kanojiya, Ld. Counsel appearing for Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, Ld. AOR, submits that vakalatnama and counter affidavit would be filed on behalf of respondent no.2.
- 19 April 2023. Despite due service on respondent nos.4, 6 to 12, 14, 15 and 17, there is no appearance. Respondent Nos.5 and 16 are unserved.
- 11 July 2023. Despite service of notice on respondent Nos. 11, 12, 14 and 17, there is no appearance on their behalf. Three weeks time, as last chance is granted to respondent Nos.
- 3 October 2023. 1 Despite the opportunities afforded, the petitioner has not taken steps for effecting service upon respondent Nos 1 and 13. 2 As prayed for, three weeks time is granted subject to do the needful, failing which the petition shall stand dismissed for non prosecution qua the above respondents. This shall be subject to pa
- 1 March 2024. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 5 April 2024. Respondent no.3 has been deleted from the array of parties. Respondent nos.2, 15, 4 to 10 and 16 have already filed counter affidavit.
- 11 July 2024. Respondent no.3 has been deleted from the array of parties. Service is complete on respondent nos.1, 11, 12, 13 and 17, but none has entered appearance.
- 29 August 2024. Respondent Nos. 2, 4 to 10, 15 and 16 have filed counter affidavit. Respondent No.3 has been deleted in terms of Hon'ble Judge in Chambers' order dated 3.10.2023.
- 20 January 2025. List on 29-01-2025 on a non-miscellaneous day.
- 29 January 2025. As prayed for, list the matter on 18.02.2025.
- 25 February 2025. List after four weeks.
- 22 April 2025. 1. We heard Ms. Madhvi Diwan, the learned Senior counsel appearing for the appellant, Mr. Purvish Malkhan, the learned Senior counsel appearing for the Respondent No.4 – Indian Bank Member of Committee of Creditors and Mr. Varun Tikamni, the learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 – Resolution Professional. 2. We grant
- 29 April 2025. 1. Our order dated 22-4-2025 is explicitly clear. 2. The same reads thus:
- 9 February 2026. Upon being mentioned by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeking urgent listing of the matter, the Registry is directed to list the matter in the week commencing 23-2-2026.
- 24 February 2026. List on 10-3-2026 on top of the Board.
- 10 March 2026. 1. Our order dated 29.4.2025 reads thus: “1. Our order dated 22-4-2025 is explicitly clear.
- 19 March 2026. 1. This matter was last heard on 10.03.2026. On the last date of hearing, the Resolution Professional (RP) was personally present. Today also, he is personally present. 2. In our order dated 10.03.2026, we have recorded the statement made by the RP that the plan is on the verge of getting finalized and by 18.03.2026 it
- 24 March 2026. List on 01-04-2026 on the top of the Board.
- 1 April 2026. 1. In pursuance of our Order dated 19.3.2026, an undertaking has been filed on Oath, duly affirmed by the Resolution Professional. 2. We want the learned counsel appearing for the appellant to look into the undertaking in details and revert on 3. Notify this matter on 6.4.2026 on the top of the Board.
- 6 April 2026. List the matter tomorrow i.e.,07.04.2026 at 2.00 P.M.
- 7 April 2026. 1. Our order dated 19.3.2026 reads thus: “1. This matter was last heard on 10.03.2026. On the last date of hearing, the Resolution Professional (RP) was personally present. Today also, he is personally present.
- 15 April 2026. List tomorrow, i.e., on 16.04.2026 as first matter on the board.
- 16 April 2026. 1. Paras 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 respectively of our order dated 7th April, 2026 speaks for itself. 2. The same reads as under:
- 28 April 2026. 1. Our order dated 16.04.2026 reads thus: 1. Paras 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 respectively of our order dated 7th April, 2026 speaks for itself.
- 4 May 2026. 1. Our order dated 28.04.2026 reads thus: “1. Our order dated 16.04.2026 reads thus:
- 5 May 2026. 1. In pursuance of our order passed last evening, i.e., 04.05.2026, the possession of the premises has been handed over to the appellant. The Superintendent of Police (SP) is personally present in the Court. He makes a statement that the possession was taken over from the Resolution Professional (RP) and the same has b
- 3 August 2026. 1. Our order dated 5th May, 2026 speaks for itself. 2. The Committee of Creditors had undertaken before us that they would remove the plant and machinery within 3 months from the date of the Order from the premises in question.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Mohit Singh, Mr. Vikrant Mehta, Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Mr. Rakesh Kr.Khanna, Mr. Kshitij Sharda, Mr. Bharat Yadav, Mr. Sidharth Pratap Singh, Mr. Roop Chaudhary, Mr. Arun Nagar, Mr. Digvijay Choudhary, Mr. Arun Kumar Nagar, Mr. Piyush Aggarwal Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, Mr. Ajay Kanojiya, Mr. S. Rajappa, Ms. Jyoti Parashar, Mr. N. J. Ramachandra, Mr. V. Prabhakar, Mr. Ajay Kanojia, Mr. Namit Suri, Ms. Surabhi Sinha, Mr. Vinay Kaushik, Mr. Aditya Bharat Manubarwala, Ms. Akriti Manibarwala
