PRATAP SINGH Versus DURGA SHANKAR MISHRA AND ORS. IN C.A. No. - 4754/2015, PAPER BOOKS INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT (CONMT.PET.(C) 965/2023)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · CONMT.PET.(C) 965/2023

Case Record

CONMT.PET.(C) 965/2023

PRATAP SINGH Versus DURGA SHANKAR MISHRA AND ORS. IN C.A. No. - 4754/2015, PAPER BOOKS INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

CONMT.PET.(C)Contempt Civil Contempt Delay Revision

25 PDF renditions· 25 distinct judicial orders· 25 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 965 OF 2023 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4754 OF 2015 PRATAP SINGH Versus DURGA SHANKAR MISHRA & ORS.. CONMT.PET.(C) 965/2023 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010165992022. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 25 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 12 August 2022 to 24 March 2026.

On 12 August 2022 the order records: Issue notice to respondent No. 3 as well as on the application seeking condonation of delay.
On 30 September 2022 the order records: Learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 prays for and is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List the matter after four weeks.
On 15 May 2023 the order records: Delay condoned. Heard learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and the alleged contemnors.
On 22 January 2024 the order records: Learned senior counsel appearing for Respondent No. 3 contends he has not received the Response Affidavit filed by the petitioner. Let a copy of the Response Affidavit be supplied to the Advocate onRecord assisting the learned senior counsel, who may go through and file the response, if any, within three weeks.
On 9 September 2024 the order records: Heard both the parties. Any documents to be relied upon by either of the parties shall be placed before this Court within four weeks from today. After four weeks, no further time shall be granted to any of the parties.
On 5 August 2025 the order records: Heard Ms. Parul Shukla,learned counsel for the petitioner(s)/applicant(s) and Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned senior counsel for the alleged contemnor(s)/respondent(s) (Chief Executive Officer, NOIDA Authority). The petitioner(s) alleges contempt of the order of this Court dated 14.05.2015 and would argue that in spite of
On 17 September 2025 the order records: 1. In view of letter dated 16 th September, 2025 circulated on behalf of the petitioner on the ground of personal difficulty, list after one week. 2. Liberty is granted to learned counsel for respondent no.3 to file additional documents.
On 24 March 2026 the order records: 1. The contempt petition is closed in terms of the signed order. 2. Pending interlocutory application(s), including intervention/ impleadment application, if any, is/are disposed of.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

12 August 2022. Issue notice to respondent No. 3 as well as on the application seeking condonation of delay.
30 September 2022. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 prays for and is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List the matter after four weeks.
17 November 2022. List the matter in the month of January, 2023.
6 January 2023. Learned counsel for the respondent no.3 prays for and is granted time for filing counter affidavit. List this matter on 18.01.2023.
24 January 2023. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter stands adjourned. Be listed after two weeks, as prayed.
20 March 2023. As prayed, let this matter be not deleted from the date already notified, i.e., 15.05.2023.
15 May 2023. Delay condoned. Heard learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and the alleged contemnors.
11 July 2023. In view of the letter circulated by the counsel for the Petitioner, this matter stands adjourned by four weeks.
23 November 2023. List in the 4th week of January, 2024.
22 January 2024. Learned senior counsel appearing for Respondent No. 3 contends he has not received the Response Affidavit filed by the petitioner. Let a copy of the Response Affidavit be supplied to the Advocate onRecord assisting the learned senior counsel, who may go through and file the response, if any, within three weeks.
19 February 2024. List this matter on 4th March, 2024.
4 March 2024. Learned counsel appearing for the newly impleaded respondent seeks time to file counter affidavit. As prayed for, list on 15.04.2024.
15 April 2024. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned senior counsel appearing for the newly impleaded respondent(s) wants to file an affidavit in the Registry of this Court. List on 23.07.2024.
23 July 2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted two weeks' time to file reply to the counter affidavit. List the matter on 09.08.2024.
9 August 2024. List on 09.09.2024.
9 September 2024. Heard both the parties. Any documents to be relied upon by either of the parties shall be placed before this Court within four weeks from today. After four weeks, no further time shall be granted to any of the parties.
10 December 2024. On the request of adjournment made by the learned counsel for the petitioner(s), adjourned to 18.03.2025.
18 July 2025. List on 05.08.2025.
5 August 2025. Heard Ms. Parul Shukla,learned counsel for the petitioner(s)/applicant(s) and Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned senior counsel for the alleged contemnor(s)/respondent(s) (Chief Executive Officer, NOIDA Authority). The petitioner(s) alleges contempt of the order of this Court dated 14.05.2015 and would argue that in spite of
17 September 2025. 1. In view of letter dated 16 th September, 2025 circulated on behalf of the petitioner on the ground of personal difficulty, list after one week. 2. Liberty is granted to learned counsel for respondent no.3 to file additional documents.
9 January 2026. 1. List on 10.02.2026 (NMD). 2. In the meanwhile, written submissions and additional documents may be filed by the parties.
17 February 2026. 1. Re-list the matter on 23.02.2026. 2. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents, will take instructions and report compliance in the meantime.
23 February 2026. List tomorrow (i.e., on 24.02.2026).
10 March 2026. 1. A short adjournment has been sought for by learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Re-list the matter on 17.03.2026.
24 March 2026. 1. The contempt petition is closed in terms of the signed order. 2. Pending interlocutory application(s), including intervention/ impleadment application, if any, is/are disposed of.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. V.K. Shukla, Mr. Anupam Mishra, Mr. Harikumar V., Mr. Jenis V. Francis, Ms. P.s. Chandralekha, Mr. V. K. Shukla, Mr. Hari Kumar V., Mr. Jenis, Mr. Rahul Sarkar, Ms. Shambhavi Mishra, Mr. Somnath Bhattacharya, Ms. Rajnandini Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Mr. Binay Kumar Das, Ms. Neha Das, Ms. Priyanka Das, Mr. Shivam Saksena, Mr. Vipin Kumar Saxena, Mr. Lokesh M., Ms. Ritu Maheshwari, Mr. Binay, Mr. Shivam Saxena, Ms. Parul Shukla, Ms. Shubhangi Pandey

Relief Sought & Granted

On 24 March 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. The contempt petition is closed in terms of the signed order. 2. Pending interlocutory application(s), including intervention/ impleadment application, if any, is/are disposed of.

The court record marks the case disposed. These order files do not contain a sentence that states the appeal or petition was allowed or dismissed, so that result is not restated here.

Subjects

Contempt Civil Contempt Delay Revision

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 24 Mar 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 24 Mar 2026

Final disposition

DISPOSED

Important procedural note

Written only from 25 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.