- 6 August 2015. All the three respondents have been served. Statement of case filed by the appellant is already on record since 28th September, 2011. No further opportunity can be granted to the respondents for the same. Since it is no more a mandate after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and in that circumstance, the Li
- 2 September 2016. Learned counsel for the appellants points out that C.A. Nos.9165-9172 of 2010 decided by a Bench presided over by Hon'ble Mr.Justice Dipak Misra also concludes the controversy involved in the present appeal.
- 2 May 2017. On being mentioned, the matter is taken on Board. List the matter on 5.5.2017.
- 5 May 2017. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that the controversy is covered by the decision rendered on 9 th September, 2017 in Civil Appeal no.9165-9172 of 2010. List the matter on 9.5.2017.
- 9 May 2017. List the matter in the third week of July, 2017.
- 22 September 2017. It is submitted by Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State of U.P. that the order passed by this Court shall be religiously CA 3280/11 complied with and for the said purpose eight weeks' time be granted. Prayer stands allowed. The compliance means that the financial benefits as
- 27 November 2017. Contempt Petition (C) No. 107/2016 and other connected Contempt Petitions Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned Additional Advocate General for the State of U.P. submits that some persons have not yet been paid and they will be paid by the end of February, 2018. Needless to say, the payment shall be made to all concerned includ
- 15 December 2017. names of performa respondent Nos.3 to 91 is allowed. The names of respondent Nos. 3 to 91 are deleted from the array of cause title at the risk of the appellants The effect of deletion shall be taken note at the time of final hearing of the appeal, if the occasion so arises.
- 14 March 2018. Let the application be listed next week before appropriate Bench as per roster.
- 12 April 2018. List after decision in C.A.Nos.716-717/2011 & batch.
- 12 February 2021. Neither the counsel for the impleadment petitioner nor the counsel for the appellant in Civil Appeal is connected. However, the learned Advocate-on-Record for the State of U.P. is present. Learned Counsel for the Official Liquidator, who is respondent No.
- 1 March 2021. No one appears even on the second call. List the matter after two weeks.
- 19 March 2021. No one has appeared in the second call. List the matter after four weeks.
- 19 April 2021. In the applications for impleadment I.A. No. 4 of 2017 and learned counsel for the appellants have not put in appearance through video conference facilities. However, learned counsel for respondent no. 3 and the State of Uttar Pradesh are present.
- 23 September 2021. Service of notice of alternative arrangement is complete on appellant no.2(counsel expired) but none has entered appearance, await appearance. Service is complete on the proposed impleader in 72632/2018 but none has entered appearance.
- 17 November 2021. Service of notice of alternative arrangement is complete on appellant no.2(counsel expired). Ld. counsel, Mr Sujeet Kumar appearing on behalf of Mr Rajesh Kumar Chaurasia, Advocate-on record appears on behalf of appellant no.2 and prays for four weeks' time to file vakalatnama. Prayer is allowed. Service is complete on
- 10 January 2022. Service of notice for alternative arrangement in respect of appellant No.2 in C.A. No.318/2013 and appellant No.4 in C.A. No. 299/2013 is complete. Ld. Advocate, Mr.Sujeet Kumar, appearing on behalf Mr.Rajesh Kumar Chaurasia, Advocate-on-record, who had undertaken on the last occasion to file vakaltnama on behalf of ap
- 18 March 2025. IA Nos.248438 & 248415/2024 1. None is present for the applicants/appellants. 2. List after four weeks.
- 30 April 2025. None appears from either side. 2. List the matter after two weeks.
- 14 July 2025. IA No. 248438/2024 seeking discharge of Advocate on Record i.e. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Chaurasia, stands allowed. (GINNY MEHTA) (AMITA PANDEY) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms. T. Anamika, Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi, Mr. Ravi Chandra Prakash, Mr. Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Luv Kumar, Mr. L. Nidhi Ram Sharma, Mr. Amit, Mr. Balraj Dewan, Mr. Purushotam Sharma Tirpathi, Ms. Kiran Suri, Mr. Purushotam Sharma Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Mr. Sandeep Singh, Ms. Alka Sinha, Ms. Shalu Sharma, Mr. Manoj Prasad, Mr. Vikrant Singh Bais, Mr. Ajay Kumar Srivastava, Mr. S.R. Singh, Mr. Vikrant Singh B., Mr. Ajit K. Srivastava, Mr. V. Dubey
