- 6 May 2024. Issue notice, returnable by six weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
- 1 August 2024. Four weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for petitioner to file affidavit with proof of dasti service in respect of respondent nos.2 to 6. Service is not complete in respect of respondent no.1.
- 19 September 2024. Ld. Counsel, Mr Ratish Kumar Sharma has submitted that he had sought time from the Court to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no.1 but now he seeks to withdraw from the same. Submission is taken on record. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time as last opportunity to file
- 5 December 2024. Service is complete on respondent nos. 3 to 6 but none has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent nos. 1 and 2 but service was effected through speed post instead of by hand. Four weeks time as last opportunity is granted to file affidavit of das
- 28 February 2025. Service is complete on respondent nos. 3 to 6 but none has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not filed fresh affidavit of dasti service after serving the same by hand to respondent nos.1 and 2 despite last opportunity having been granted. Today it has been submitted by ld. Counsel for the petitione
- 24 April 2025. Delay in filing the fresh particulars is condoned. Registry to proceed as per Rules.
- 8 August 2025. Service is complete on respondent nos. 3 to 6 but none has entered appearance. As sought, ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks time to file affidavit alongwith proof of dasti service in respect of respondent nos.1 and 2.
- 18 September 2025. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed affidavit of dasti service stating therein that daughter and sister of respondent Nos.1 and 2 respectively have refused to receive Dasti notice. As refusal of dasti service cannot be considered as proper service in light of Order LIII, Rule 3 of Supreme Court Rules, hence, Ld. C
- 10 November 2025. Service is complete on respondent nos. 1 and 2 through the concerned Trial Court but none has entered appearance. Service is complete on respondent nos. 3 to 6 but none has entered appearance.
- 13 January 2026. The Transfer Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the signed order. (KANCHAN CHOUHAN) (ANU BHALLA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Mr. Ankit Sharma, Mr. Ratish Kumar Sharma Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Ratish Kumar Sharma, Mr. Narender Rathi, Mr. Sandeep Deshwal
