PAWAN KUMAR AND ORS. IV [P-6], [P-66], [P-67] Versus STATE OF HARYANA URBAN ESTATE DEPARTMENT THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF HARYANA AND ORS. (C.A. 4247/2012)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 4247/2012

Case Record

C.A. 4247/2012

PAWAN KUMAR AND ORS. IV [P-6], [P-66], [P-67] Versus STATE OF HARYANA URBAN ESTATE DEPARTMENT THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF HARYANA AND ORS.

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI · HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE V. MOHANA

C.A.Speed up proceedings Civil appeals

56 PDF renditions· 56 distinct judicial orders· 28 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

PAWAN KUMAR & ORS. Versus STATE OF HARYANA URBAN ESTATE DEPARTMENT THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF HARYANA & ORS.. C.A. 4247/2012 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010146572010. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 28 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 19 November 2012 to 13 April 2026.

On 19 November 2012 the order records: This is an application by Smt. Sudershan, W/o Sh. Ranbir Singh Chillar, R/o House No. 13, Sector-4, Rohtak, Haryana and Sneh Lata, D/o Ranbir Singh, R/o Ram Gopal Colony, Sonepat Road, Rohtak, Haryana for impleadment as parties to Civil Appeal No. 4247 of 2012 arising out of SLP (C) 14692 of 2010. I have heard Mr. Prem
On 27 April 2015 the order records: Digitally signed by Neeta Sapra Date: 2015.04.28 16:44:54 IST Reason: Heard learned counsel for the appellants, applicants and learned counsel for the respondents in these applications. The applications are not opposed. Learned counsel for the applicants further submitted that in the same acquisition earlier certain pe
On 15 March 2018 the order records: The prayer for early hearing was acceeded to on 4.12.2017. Service was, however, not complete. On 18.1.2018, four weeks' time was granted to the respondent State to file publication in respect of unserved respondents. Office report states that this order has not been complied with nor has any proof of publication been
On 11 March 2019 the order records: An application has been filed informing this court that the appellant has deliberately impleaded the batch of respondents in the petition who are not even remotely concerned with the dispute, just to defer the proceedings on this count. Record reveals that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not taking interest i
On 28 February 2025 the order records: Ld. Counsel for the appellants has been designated as Senior Advocate. Appellant No.82 has expired. Four weeks' time is granted to Ld. Counsels for the represented appellants to take appropriate steps.
On 22 April 2025 the order records: Ld. Counsel for all the appellants has been designated as Senior Advocate. Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks time as last opportunity to take appropriate steps in respect of deceased appellant nos. 4,42, 47 and 82.
On 18 July 2025 the order records: Appellant Nos. 1, 5, 6, 57 I & 57J, 7 to 10, 12, 13, 20 to 22, 24 to 31, 35 to 37, 39 to 41, 45, 46, 48 to 50, 55, 57A to 57C, 57E to 57H, 69, 71, 80, 81, 83 to 87 and 91 to 94 are duly represented. Memo of appearance has been filed on behalf of appellant Nos. 23, 33, 34, 44, 47, 51, 54, 57L, 58 to 61.
On 13 April 2026 the order records: IA No. 79909/2026 1. List the appeal for hearing in August, 2026 before an appropriate Bench. 2. I.A. No.79909/2026 stands allowed accordingly.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

19 November 2012. This is an application by Smt. Sudershan, W/o Sh. Ranbir Singh Chillar, R/o House No. 13, Sector-4, Rohtak, Haryana and Sneh Lata, D/o Ranbir Singh, R/o Ram Gopal Colony, Sonepat Road, Rohtak, Haryana for impleadment as parties to Civil Appeal No. 4247 of 2012 arising out of SLP (C) 14692 of 2010. I have heard Mr. Prem
5 August 2013. indicating the posting of the case on 2nd September, 2013 in terms of the orders. |(NEETA) | |(INDU POKHRIYAL) | |Sr.P.A. | |
29 April 2014. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to serve impleadment application to the respective counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the appellants undertakes that he will serve copy of the impleadment application today i.e., the 29th April, 2014.
11 July 2014. The applicant to serve notice on the learned Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Suman Wadhwa Date: 2014.07.14 counsel for the appellants within two weeks. 17:52:09 IST Reason:
11 August 2014. Application for impleading the applicants as appellants (I.A. No. 14 of 2014) will be considered along with the civil appeal. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Sushil Kumar Rakheja Date: 2014.08.14 17:58:58 IST Reason:
13 November 2014. the instant civil appeal to be heard and disposed of at the time of final hearing of appeal. As a last opportunity, six weeks' time is granted to the State of Haryana for effecting service on the unserved respondents.
27 April 2015. Digitally signed by Neeta Sapra Date: 2015.04.28 16:44:54 IST Reason: Heard learned counsel for the appellants, applicants and learned counsel for the respondents in these applications. The applications are not opposed. Learned counsel for the applicants further submitted that in the same acquisition earlier certain pe
26 November 2015. Interlocutory applications for impleading the applicants are allowed. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ASHWANI KUMAR Date: 2015.11.26 17:04:59 IST Reason:
29 April 2016. Perused the letter. List the applications after four weeks.
30 June 2016. Issue notice to the State of Haryana only, at this stage. Reply of the State, if any, may be filed in the meantime.
18 October 2016. To be notified in the first week of November, 2016, if the I.As are ready for hearing.
11 November 2016. As already ordered, I.As. be listed along with the Hearing of the appeal be expedited. [VINOD LAKHINA]
4 December 2017. This is an application for early hearing. The Registry is directed to list the matter along with other connected matters.
18 January 2018. None appears on behalf of either of the parties. However, four weeks' time is granted to the appellants to file proof of publication in respect of unserved respondents.
15 March 2018. The prayer for early hearing was acceeded to on 4.12.2017. Service was, however, not complete. On 18.1.2018, four weeks' time was granted to the respondent State to file publication in respect of unserved respondents. Office report states that this order has not been complied with nor has any proof of publication been
24 April 2018. As a last opportunity, four weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the respondent-State to file affidavit of service along with proof of publication. (SHASHI SAREEN) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) AR CUM PS BRANCH OFFICER
14 May 2018. applicants/appellants from I.A. No.23/2016 is allowed. (SONALI SAUND) (ANITA RANI AHUJA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
13 November 2018. Process letter dt.19.7.2018 as per rules for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.
11 March 2019. An application has been filed informing this court that the appellant has deliberately impleaded the batch of respondents in the petition who are not even remotely concerned with the dispute, just to defer the proceedings on this count. Record reveals that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not taking interest i
21 February 2023. List before an appropriate Bench in the second week of March, 2023, subject to the directions of the Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India, as the matter pertains to the year 2012.
15 March 2023. 1. The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. 2. Additional documents, if any, filed by Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Advocate-on-Record for appellant Nos.1-6 may be accepted by the Registry for our consideration on the next date of hearing.
27 April 2023. At the request of learned counsel for the appellants, list on 10.05.2023. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
13 July 2023. List on 31.08.2023. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
28 February 2025. Ld. Counsel for the appellants has been designated as Senior Advocate. Appellant No.82 has expired. Four weeks' time is granted to Ld. Counsels for the represented appellants to take appropriate steps.
22 April 2025. Ld. Counsel for all the appellants has been designated as Senior Advocate. Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks time as last opportunity to take appropriate steps in respect of deceased appellant nos. 4,42, 47 and 82.
18 July 2025. Appellant Nos. 1, 5, 6, 57 I & 57J, 7 to 10, 12, 13, 20 to 22, 24 to 31, 35 to 37, 39 to 41, 45, 46, 48 to 50, 55, 57A to 57C, 57E to 57H, 69, 71, 80, 81, 83 to 87 and 91 to 94 are duly represented. Memo of appearance has been filed on behalf of appellant Nos. 23, 33, 34, 44, 47, 51, 54, 57L, 58 to 61.
25 August 2025. 1. None appears for the appellants. 2. In the interest of justice, list the matter after two weeks.
13 April 2026. IA No. 79909/2026 1. List the appeal for hearing in August, 2026 before an appropriate Bench. 2. I.A. No.79909/2026 stands allowed accordingly.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Prem Malhotra, Mr. Rishi Malhotra, Mr. D. N. Goburdhan, Ms. Shweta Rani, Mr. Rajat Roshan Sharma, Ms. Pallavi Chopra, Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Ms. Muskan Agarwal, Ms. Rhythm Bharadwaj, Ms. Suman Sharma, Ms. Niharika Singh Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Manjit Singh, Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Mr. Sushil Kumar Jain, Ms. Christi Jain, Ms. Rachita Gohil, Ms. Pratibha Jain, Mr. Sushil Jain, Mr. Puneet Jain, Mr. Anas Riyaz, Dr. Monika Gusain, Mr. Ravindra Bana, Mr. Vinay Garg

Relief Sought & Granted

On 13 April 2026 the latest order on this record says: IA No. 79909/2026 1. List the appeal for hearing in August, 2026 before an appropriate Bench. 2. I.A. No.79909/2026 stands allowed accordingly.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Speed up proceedings Civil appeals

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 13 Apr 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 13 Apr 2026

Next hearing

13 Apr 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 28 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 17 other files in the folder were left out.