PATIALA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. Versus PREM CHAND (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANR. vide Hon'ble Court's order dated 21.05.2025, list after ensuing partial Court working days, 2025. (C.A. 18325/2017)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 18325/2017

Case Record

C.A. 18325/2017

PATIALA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. Versus PREM CHAND (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANR. vide Hon'ble Court's order dated 21.05.2025, list after ensuing partial Court working days, 2025.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

15 PDF renditions· 15 distinct judicial orders· 15 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

SECTION IV BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT SPECIAL LOK ADALAT PROCEEDINGS OF CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 18325/2017 PATIALA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. Versus PREM CHAND (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ANR.. C.A. 18325/2017 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010274972017. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 15 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 27 October 2017 to 22 August 2026.

On 27 October 2017 the order records: Delay condoned. Leave granted.
On 9 April 2019 the order records: Service is complete qua respondent No.2 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. As per High Court report, respondent No.1 has expired.
On 30 August 2019 the order records: Respondent No.1 is reported to be dead. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks, as last chance file an application for substitution to bring on record his Lrs. Service of notice is complete qua respondent No.2 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.
On 9 January 2020 the order records: Service is complete upon respondent No. 2, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Ld. counsel for the petitioner has already filed an application for substitution which is defective in respect of deceased Respondent No. 1. Ld. counsel shall with in a period of four weeks rectify the defects whatever have been
On 3 March 2020 the order records: Service of notice is complete qua respondent No.2 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Learned counsel for appellant has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased re spondent No.1. Registry has pointed out defects in the said application.
On 9 March 2022 the order records: Certificate of service in respect of unserved respondent Nos. 1(i) and 1(vii) is awaited from the High Court. D.O. shall be issued to the Registrar General of the High Court for dispatching of the certificate at the earliest but not later than two weeks from the receipt of the D.O.
On 21 May 2025 the order records: 1. As per Office Report dated 20.05.2025, application has been filed to dispose of the Civil Appeal on the basis of the settlement. However, according to the Office, in the affidavit, the name of the deponent is disclosed as Babal Kumar whereas in the cause-title of the Civil Appeal, the name is mentioned as Balbir Kum
On 22 August 2026 the order records: 1. The settlement format dated 03.07.2026, forwarded by the CJM-cum-Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Patiala, is on record. 2. The Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Patiala, is present through video conferencing mode.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

27 October 2017. Delay condoned. Leave granted.
6 July 2018. Await certificate of service of both the respondents from the concerned court. List again on 21.8.2018.
4 December 2018. Reminder be issued for certificate of service in respect of both respondents. List again on 4.2.2019.
4 February 2019. Await certificate of service of both respondents. List again on 4.4.2019.
9 April 2019. Service is complete qua respondent No.2 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. As per High Court report, respondent No.1 has expired.
30 August 2019. Respondent No.1 is reported to be dead. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks, as last chance file an application for substitution to bring on record his Lrs. Service of notice is complete qua respondent No.2 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.
9 January 2020. Service is complete upon respondent No. 2, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Ld. counsel for the petitioner has already filed an application for substitution which is defective in respect of deceased Respondent No. 1. Ld. counsel shall with in a period of four weeks rectify the defects whatever have been
3 March 2020. Service of notice is complete qua respondent No.2 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Learned counsel for appellant has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased re spondent No.1. Registry has pointed out defects in the said application.
25 June 2020. Service is complete on respondent no.2 but none has entered appearance. Application for substitution alongwith application for condonation of delay in respect of deceased respondent no.1 be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for orders.
23 November 2020. IA Nos. 136173/2019, 57225/2020 & 57226/2020 Application for substitution of deceased respondent is allowed subject to all just exceptions after condoning the delay and setting aside abatement in filing the substitution application. Applications are accordingly allowed.
9 March 2022. Certificate of service in respect of unserved respondent Nos. 1(i) and 1(vii) is awaited from the High Court. D.O. shall be issued to the Registrar General of the High Court for dispatching of the certificate at the earliest but not later than two weeks from the receipt of the D.O.
22 April 2022. Service is complete on respondent nos. 1(i) to 1(vii) and 2 but none has entered appearance on their behalf. Parties may file statement of case within the stipulated period.
21 May 2025. 1. As per Office Report dated 20.05.2025, application has been filed to dispose of the Civil Appeal on the basis of the settlement. However, according to the Office, in the affidavit, the name of the deponent is disclosed as Babal Kumar whereas in the cause-title of the Civil Appeal, the name is mentioned as Balbir Kum
27 January 2026. 1. The learned counsel for the appellant prays for a week's further time to comply with our order dated 21.05.2025. 2. List immediately after two weeks.
22 August 2026. 1. The settlement format dated 03.07.2026, forwarded by the CJM-cum-Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Patiala, is on record. 2. The Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Patiala, is present through video conferencing mode.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Jimmy Singla, Mr. U.P. Singh, Mr. D. K. Devesh, Mr. Vikrant Y.S. Narula, Mr. Rohit Vats, Mr. Robin Khokhar, Mr. Vikrant Y. S. Narula, Mr. J. Singh, Dr Satish Chandra, Ms. Shashi Kiran, Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, Dr. Satish Chandra Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Nisarg Choudhary, Mr. Puneet Sheoran, Mr. Prashant Karan, Mr. Sandeep Kumar Sansanwal, Mr. Manish Kumar, Ms. Aarti Sheoran

Relief Sought & Granted

On 22 August 2026 the order records: As such, the appellant proposes to withdraw the civil appeal. 5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 22 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 22 Aug 2026

Final disposition

As such, the appellant proposes to withdraw the civil appeal. 5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

Important procedural note

Written only from 15 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.