PARVATHI AND ANR. Versus CHITRAKANNU NADAR (DIED) THROUGH LR.S. AND ORS. [R-1.1.4], [R-1.1.1], [R-1.1.3] (C.A. 3111/2024)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 3111/2024

Case Record

C.A. 3111/2024

PARVATHI AND ANR. Versus CHITRAKANNU NADAR (DIED) THROUGH LR.S. AND ORS. [R-1.1.4], [R-1.1.1], [R-1.1.3]

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay Property Taxation

14 PDF renditions· 14 distinct judicial orders· 10 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

OF 2024 PARVATHI & ANR. Versus CHITRAKANNU NADAR (DIED) THROUGH LR.S. & ORS.. C.A. 3111/2024 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010466812018. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 10 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 7 January 2019 to 23 August 2026.

On 7 January 2019 the order records: Issue notice, returnable within four weeks. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.
On 9 April 2019 the order records: Delay in filing spare copies is condoned. Registry to issue notice with utmost dispatch. It appears that all the respondents have already filed the vakalatnama. Four weeks' time is given to file counter affidavit.
On 2 September 2019 the order records: Four weeks' time, as a last chance is given to all respondents to file the counter affidavit. After expiry of four weeks, the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.
On 10 July 2023 the order records: Learned counsel for the petitioners has prayed for time to seek instructions in the matter. Re-list on 31.07.2023.
On 31 July 2023 the order records: Delay condoned. Abatement is set aside. Application for bringing on record the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner No. 1 (Selvasaroja) is allowed.
On 26 June 2024 the order records: On the request made by learned counsel appearing for the appellant(s), the matter is adjourned.
On 26 September 2024 the order records: 1. This is a cross appeal filed by the respondent(s) in the connected appeal. The appellant in the connected appeal represented by MR. V. Ramasubramanian accepts notice on behalf of the respondent nos.1 and 2. Service is complete on respondent no.3 but none has entered appearance on his behalf. 2. Four weeks time is gr
On 23 August 2026 the order records: 1. The civil dispute with respect to the share in the suit property has been amicably settled through Settlement Deed dated 30.07.2026, which has been placed on record. 2. The appeals are, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the said Settlement Deed.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

7 January 2019. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.
9 April 2019. Delay in filing spare copies is condoned. Registry to issue notice with utmost dispatch. It appears that all the respondents have already filed the vakalatnama. Four weeks' time is given to file counter affidavit.
2 September 2019. Four weeks' time, as a last chance is given to all respondents to file the counter affidavit. After expiry of four weeks, the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.
6 July 2023. List on 10th July, 2023. (NIDHI AHUJA) (VIRENDER SINGH) AR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER
10 July 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners has prayed for time to seek instructions in the matter. Re-list on 31.07.2023.
31 July 2023. Delay condoned. Abatement is set aside. Application for bringing on record the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner No. 1 (Selvasaroja) is allowed.
22 February 2024. Delay condoned. Leave granted.
26 June 2024. On the request made by learned counsel appearing for the appellant(s), the matter is adjourned.
26 September 2024. 1. This is a cross appeal filed by the respondent(s) in the connected appeal. The appellant in the connected appeal represented by MR. V. Ramasubramanian accepts notice on behalf of the respondent nos.1 and 2. Service is complete on respondent no.3 but none has entered appearance on his behalf. 2. Four weeks time is gr
23 August 2026. 1. The civil dispute with respect to the share in the suit property has been amicably settled through Settlement Deed dated 30.07.2026, which has been placed on record. 2. The appeals are, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the said Settlement Deed.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Mr. Y. Arunagiri, Mr. P. Soma Sundaram, Mr. P.K. Kar, Mr. V. Ramasubramanian, Mr. M.P. Parthiban Advocates — Respondents: Mr. V. Ramasubramanian, Mr. V. Vasudevan, Mr. B. Ramaswamy

Relief Sought & Granted

On 31 July 2023 the order records: Application for bringing on record the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner No. 1 (Selvasaroja) is allowed.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay Property Taxation

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 23 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 23 Aug 2026

Final disposition

Application for bringing on record the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner No. 1 (Selvasaroja) is allowed.

Important procedural note

Written only from 10 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 4 other files in the folder were left out.