A.P.STATE WAKF BOARD TR. CHAIRPERSON Versus JANAKI BUSAPPA . AND ORS. [ HEARD BY : HON. M.M. SUNDRESH AND HON. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JJ. ] SUBSTITUTION AFFIDAVIT (C.A. 1946/2013)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 1946/2013

Case Record

C.A. 1946/2013

A.P.STATE WAKF BOARD TR. CHAIRPERSON Versus JANAKI BUSAPPA . AND ORS. [ HEARD BY : HON. M.M. SUNDRESH AND HON. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JJ. ] SUBSTITUTION AFFIDAVIT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

46 PDF renditions· 46 distinct judicial orders· 27 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

A.P.STATE WAKF BOARD THR. CHAIRPERSON Versus JANAKI BUSAPPA & ORS.. C.A. 1946/2013 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010101292011. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 27 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 17 September 2014 to 24 April 2026.

On 17 September 2014 the order records: The office report indicates that the respondent No.9 has expired. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall file an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the said deceased respondent within a period three weeks. List again on 4.12.2014.
On 18 February 2015 the order records: The office report states that the learned counsel for the appellant has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent Nos. 9 and 10. The said application shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List t
On 8 August 2016 the order records: The office report indicates that the learned counsel for the appellant has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No. 11 which is defective. The learned counsel shall within a period of four weeks rectify the defects whatever have been found in the said application.
On 20 September 2016 the order records: The respondent No.14 has been served through notice of alternative arrangement, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the respondent No.11.
On 11 November 2016 the order records: Applications for condonation of delay in filing substitution application and application for substitution to bring on record the LRs. of deceased respondent No.11 have been filed. Delay in filing the application for bringing on record LRs. is condoned. Abatement, if any, stands set aside. The application to bring on re
On 28 September 2018 the order records: Ld.counsel for the appellant shall file the spare copy within two weeks for issuance of notice to the Lrs. of deceased respondent No.11. Ld.counsel for respondent Nos.1-8, 9(i) to 9(vi),12,13 & 14 informs that respondent No.9(i) has expired. He further informs that respondent No.10(i) has also expired. Ld.counsel for t
On 29 November 2018 the order records: Certificate of service qua Lrs. of deceased respondent No.11 from the concerned High Court has been received. But no one has entered appearance. In respect of Lrs. of deceased respondent Nos.9(i) & 10(i), Ld.counsel for the appellant submits that the above Lrs. are already on record. Registry to verify the same and mak
On 18 February 2026 the order records: 1. Arguments heard. 2. Judgment reserved.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

17 September 2014. The office report indicates that the respondent No.9 has expired. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall file an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the said deceased respondent within a period three weeks. List again on 4.12.2014.
4 December 2014. Ld.counsel for the appellant shall comply with the terms of the office report within a period of three weeks. List again on 18.02.2015.
18 February 2015. The office report states that the learned counsel for the appellant has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent Nos. 9 and 10. The said application shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List t
30 March 2015. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Delay in filing the substitution application of proposed Lrs. of deceased respondent nos. 9 and 10 is condoned.
8 August 2016. The office report indicates that the learned counsel for the appellant has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No. 11 which is defective. The learned counsel shall within a period of four weeks rectify the defects whatever have been found in the said application.
20 September 2016. The respondent No.14 has been served through notice of alternative arrangement, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the respondent No.11.
11 November 2016. Applications for condonation of delay in filing substitution application and application for substitution to bring on record the LRs. of deceased respondent No.11 have been filed. Delay in filing the application for bringing on record LRs. is condoned. Abatement, if any, stands set aside. The application to bring on re
28 September 2018. Ld.counsel for the appellant shall file the spare copy within two weeks for issuance of notice to the Lrs. of deceased respondent No.11. Ld.counsel for respondent Nos.1-8, 9(i) to 9(vi),12,13 & 14 informs that respondent No.9(i) has expired. He further informs that respondent No.10(i) has also expired. Ld.counsel for t
29 November 2018. Certificate of service qua Lrs. of deceased respondent No.11 from the concerned High Court has been received. But no one has entered appearance. In respect of Lrs. of deceased respondent Nos.9(i) & 10(i), Ld.counsel for the appellant submits that the above Lrs. are already on record. Registry to verify the same and mak
10 December 2018. Ld. Counsel for appellant has filed a letter stating therein that Lrs. of deceased respondent Nos. 9(i) and 10(1i) are already on record. Ld. Counsel shall within a period of four weeks file proper application.
14 October 2019. Both the interlocutory applications are allowed, as prayed for. Registry is directed to proceed with the matter further.
20 November 2019. Appearance :Ld. counsel for petitioner is present. Ld. Counsel for respondent is present.
3 August 2021. Mr. Huzefa Ahmedi, learned senior counsel for the appellant states that one of the respondents has since died and he shall implead the legal heirs of the deceased respondent within four weeks. List thereafter.
5 May 2022. Due to indisposition of the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant, a short adjournment has been sought for. List after four weeks.
22 October 2024. List the matter in the month of March, 2025.
20 March 2025. Delay in filing application for substitution is condoned. Application for substitution to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased respondent No.6 is allowed.
24 April 2025. List the matter on 15.05.2025.
15 May 2025. List on 07.08.2025.
7 August 2025. List the matter on 17.09.2025.
17 September 2025. List the matter on 29.10.2025.
6 November 2025. As prayed, list next week.
12 November 2025. List the matter on 26th November, 2025.
26 November 2025. List the matter on 03.12.2025.
12 February 2026. At request of learned counsel for the appellant, list the matter next week.
18 February 2026. 1. Arguments heard. 2. Judgment reserved.
24 April 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
24 April 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, Ms. Shivani Khandekar, Ms. Vidyottma, Ms. Gitanjali N. Sharma, Mr. C. Kannan, Ms. D. Tejaswi Reddy, Mr. Huzefa Ahmedi, Mrs. D.Bharathi Reddy, Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, Mr. Shoeb Alam, Mr. Nishant Sharma, Ms. Adviteeya Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, Ms. T. Anamika, Mr. V. Sudeer, Mr. Rama Subba Raju, Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Ms. Monika Yadav, Mr. D. Abhinav Rao, Mr. M.B. Ramasubba Raju, Ms. Soumyashree Kulkarni, Ms. Megha Khanna, Mr. Anoop Prakash Awasthi, Mr. E.P. Gopinatham

Relief Sought & Granted

On 18 February 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. Arguments heard. 2. Judgment reserved.

The court record marks the case disposed. These order files do not contain a sentence that states the appeal or petition was allowed or dismissed, so that result is not restated here.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 24 Apr 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 24 Apr 2026

Final disposition

DISPOSED

Important procedural note

Written only from 27 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 6 other files in the folder were left out.