- 15 November 2018. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks and is granted four weeks' time, by way of last opportunity, to cure the defects.
- 24 September 2019. Application for condonation of delay in refiling the special leave petition is condoned subject to deposit of cost of Rs.3,000/- with the Supreme Court Employees Mutual Welfare Fund within two weeks.
- 21 October 2019. In view of the personal difficulty of the advocate-on-record for the petitioner, list the matter after two weeks.
- 6 January 2020. Application for exemption from filing official translation is allowed. Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on illustration (ii) of Section 113 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, which according to him, has been glossed over by the High Court.
- 7 February 2020. Service is complete on respondent nos. 1 and 4 but none has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time for filing affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent nos. 2,3 and 5 to 8.
- 5 October 2020. Record shows that respondent no.1 has been served on 22.1.2020 and vakalatnama has been filed on 10.2.2020 but counter affidavit has not been filed till date. However, respondent no.1 is granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent no.4 but none has entered
- 16 December 2020. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for and is granted four weeks further time finally to file affidavit of dasti service in respect of Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 5 to 8 failing which the special leave petition shall stand dismissed as against the unserved respondents. (GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) AR-CUM-P
- 10 March 2022. Ld. counsel for respondent no.1 prays for further time to file counter affidavit. Office report indicates that on the earlier occasion the said respondent was granted final opportunity to file counter affidavit however, counter affidavit has not been filed; as such, prayer for further time is refused. Service is comple
- 22 April 2024. At the request of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on account of personal difficulty, list the matter on (KAVITA PAHUJA) (RENU BALA GAMBHIR)
- 8 July 2024. List on 10.9.2024. (DR. NAVEEN RAWAL) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) DY. REGISTRAR
- 22 October 2024. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment, list in the third week of November, 2024. (DR. NAVEEN RAWAL) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) DY. REGISTRAR
- 22 November 2024. Leave granted. Hearing expedited. List in the second week of February, 2025.
- 13 February 2025. At request of learned counsel for the appellant, list the matter after two weeks.
- 23 August 2026. 1. We have interacted with the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Mayiladuthurai, Tamil Nadu who has informed us that the settlement has been arrived at between the parties. 2. However, Ms. Jyoti Parashar, learned counsel appearing 1 of 2 for the respondent no. 1 has some objections about the settlement.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Ashish Kr. Upadhyay, Mr. Y. Lokesh, Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, Mr. Ashish Kumar Upadhyay, Ms. V. Susheatha, Mr. Babul Kumar, Mr. P. Abinesh Kartik, Mr Deepak, Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran, Mr. V. Kandha Prabhu, Ms. Maitri Goal, Mr. Sachin Kumar Verma Advocates — Respondents: Mr. S. Rajappa, Mr N.J.Ramchandar, Ms. Jyoti Parashar, Mr. Naanchil
