- 8 May 2018. Affidavit of valuation and ad valorem court fee has been filed. and 10952 of 2016 Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing affidavit of valuation and ad valorem court fee.
- 23 July 2018. 10422, 10421, 10952 of 2016. Despite last opportunity for filing affidavit of valuation and deficit court fee has not been filed.
- 13 August 2018. The learned counsel for the appellants submits that deficit court fees has been filed and affidavit of valuation shall be filed within four weeks. Accordingly, four weeks' time is granted for filing affidavit of valuation.
- 23 October 2018. Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the appellant for payment of deficit course fees.
- 23 October 2018. of 2016 Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the appellant for payment of deficit course fees.
- 13 December 2018. Learned counsel for the appellants has filed deficit court fees. List the matters in due course.
- 9 May 2022. Learned counsel for the appellant(s) has invited our attention to the recent amendment vide the Finance Act, 2022, which come into effect from 30.03.2022, in particular, clause 97, which in effect validates all the previous actions, including the ones referred to in the present set of cases. Learned counsel for the res
- 26 July 2022. Our attention is invited to the order passed in Review Petition No. 400 of 2021 in the case of Commissioner of Customs Vs. M/s. Canon India Pvt. Ltd. dated 19.05.2022. In deference to the observation made by the Court, learned counsel appearing for the respective parties fairly accept the suggestion to await the decisi
- 16 October 2025. Post these matters on 28-10-2025 at 2.00 p.m.
- 28 October 2025. List on 9.12.2025 at 2.00 P.M.
- 20 January 2026. List on 21-01-2026.
- 21 January 2026. Post these matters on 22-1-2026.
- 22 January 2026. 1. We have a batch of Civil Appeals and these Appeals have something to do with the decision of this Court rendered in “Commissioner of Customs v. Canon India Pvt. Ltd.” Reported in (2024) SCC Online SC 3188 decided on 7-11-2024. 2. In this batch of appeals, some of the appeals are filed at the instance of the Revenue
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms Suriti Chowdhary, Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Ms Sunita, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Mr. Purvish Jitendra Malkan, Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Ms. Suriti C. Adv., Ms. Sunita Rani Singh, Ms. Shobha Ramamoorthy, Mr. Sri Ram J. Thalapathy Advocates — Respondents: Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Mr. Ajay Pal, Ms. Rashi Bansal, Mr. T. L. Garg, Mr. M. P. Devanath, Mrs Pankhuri Shrivastava, Mr Karuppaiah Meyyappan, Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Mr. Pawanshree Agrawal, Dr. Kailash Chand, Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Mr. Nikhil Jain
