- 20 February 2024. Delay condoned. 2. It is pointed out by Mr. Surya Kant Vyas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that this case pertains to demand of development charge from the Builder and is similar to the pending Civil Appeal No.8975/2022. Similarity of the issue is not disputed by Mr. Chirag M.
- 18 October 2024. Service is complete on all the respondents. As sought, four weeks' time is granted to the appearing respondents for filing counter affidavit.
- 19 February 2025. Respondent nos.1 and 2 are duly represented. Despite service being complete, none has entered appearance for respondent no.3.
- 8 April 2025. Service is deemed to be complete on respondent Nos.1 and 2 as they are common respondents in the main matter i.e. this matter.
- 30 April 2025. At the request of learned counsel for the appellant(s), eight weeks' time is granted to comply with the Office objection(s).
- 29 October 2025. 1. Learned counsel for the appellant(s) prays for two weeks time to take appropriate steps in the matter(s). He is granted two weeks time to do needful. 2. The application for deletion of respondent no.5 filed in 3. Learned counsel for the appellant(s) prays two weeks' time to cure the defects as pointed out by the Reg
- 25 August 2026. 1. As per office report, service is complete. 2. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Court.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Surya Kant Vyas, Mr. Siddharth Praveen Acharya, Mr. Arun Panickar, Ms. Vartika Singh, Mr. Ravi Kant Purohit, Mr. Bhunesh Vyas, Mr. Lokendra Singh, Ms. Mithu Jain, Mr. Kunal Mimani, Mr. Kartikey Bhatt, Mr. Akshay Luthra, Ms. Anshula Vijay Kumar Grover Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Mr. Dhananjay Kataria, Mrs. Mahima, Mr. Yuvraj Gaikwad, Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Ms. Nivedita Nair, Mr. Ashish Wad, Mrs. Tamali Wad, Ms. Swati Arya, Ms. Akriti Arya
