- 7 February 2017. Parties have not filed statement of case and statutory period has expired. Registry to process the matter for being listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
- 19 September 2018. Applicant is opposed. Counsel for the respondent seeks four weeks time to file objection. Adjourn the matter by four weeks'.
- 22 October 2018. Two weeks' time, as a last opportunity, is granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to do the needful in both the matters.
- 12 November 2018. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed reply to the application for substitution. List the matter for arguments on the next date. Two weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the appellant for filing Rejoinder in the application for substitution. List the matter for hearing thereafter.
- 3 December 2018. List on 10th December, 2018.
- 10 December 2018. IA No.82569/2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The applicant-Gunvaneet Kaur has filed I.A.
- 22 April 2019. Both matters Respondent no.1 has been deleted from the array of parties vide order dt.27.1.2015. Respondent nos. 2 and 3 are served/represented.
- 6 April 2021. Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps and to file sp are copies qua Respondent No. 2(i) in CA No.2098 -2099/2015 (who is common as Respondent No. 1(i) in CA No. 2100-2101/2015). As per office report, common appellant in both the cases has died. Learned counsel for the
- 3 February 2023. In both the matters numbered above, service of NLPA is complete on all the respondents. Being complete matters, process the same for being listed before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. PAVANESH D.
- 15 September 2023. IA NO. 172807/2023 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2098-2099/2015 & I.A. NO. 172802/2023 IN C.A. NO. 2100-2101/2015 These applications are redundant as there is no delay, so to say, as one legal representative of deceased respondent no.2 is already on record. These applications are accordingly dismissed on that ground. IA No. 1
- 1 November 2023. As per office report, notice to proposed legal representative viz. Dr. Alka Kohli, could not be delivered for the reason that the unserved cover has been received with the remark “No such person found at the given address”. Three weeks time is granted to the petitioner for taking fresh steps in respect thereof.
- 24 November 2023. Office Report dated 23.11.2023 reflects that the learned counsel for the petitioners furnished fresh particulars of the unserved proposed L.R. of deceased respondent No.1, viz., Dr. Alka Kohli. Registry shall take steps to effect service of notice at the fresh address of the proposed L.R. as per due procedure.
- 4 November 2024. Notice issued to proposed Lr. namely Dr. Alka Kohli has been returned back unserved with remarks “Damaged due to inclement weather”. Hence, notice be re-issued to the proposed Lr. of deceased respondent no.1. List again on 06.12.2024.
- 27 January 2025. Both matters Two weeks' time is granted to Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps and to file fresh particulars for service on common proposed Lr. of deceased respondent No.1. List again on 27.02.2025.
- 27 February 2025. Both matters Service on common proposed Lr. of deceased respondent no. 1 is still awaited. List again on 17.04.2025.
- 17 April 2025. Both matters Service report with regard to proposed lr. Of deceased respondent no.1 has been received from ABC Legal Services unserved with remarks “Proof of payment issue.” Hence, four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps in accordance with the report recei
- 17 July 2025. Both matters Proposed Lr. of deceased respondent No.1 is residing in U.S.A. Service report on the said proposed Lr. is still awaited. List again on 31.7.2025.
- 31 July 2025. Both matters Service report is still awaited with regard to the proposed Lrs. of deceased respondent No.1. Let a reminder be issued. List again on 14.8.2025.
- 14 August 2025. Both matters Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps and to file fresh particulars for service on proposed Lr. of deceased respondent No.1. It has been submitted by the Ld. counsel that permission be granted to serve the above-mentioned proposed Lr. also through paper publication. L
- 4 September 2025. As per office report ld. Counsel for the appellant has not taken fresh steps for service on the proposed legal representatives of deceased respondent no.1. Two weeks time as last opportunity is granted for the same. List again on 15.10.2025.
- 15 October 2025. Both matters Proposed respondent No.2.2 in C.A.No. 2098-2099/2015 and proposed respondent No.1.2 in C.A. No. 2100-2101/2015 are common. Ld. counsel for the appellant has filed a letter containing complete and latest address of proposed legal representative/Dr. Alka Kohli along-with application seeking substituted servi
- 31 October 2025. Both matters. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed an application seeking condonation of delay in filing substituted service in respect of common proposed respondent no.2.2 in C.A No. 2098 99/2015 and common proposed respondent no. 1.2 in C.A No. 2100 2101/2015. Delay is condoned.
- 20 November 2025. IA No. 248026/2025 in C.A. No(s). 2098-2099/2015 Application prays for effecting substituted service of notice by publication in newspaper. For the reason stated in the application, the application is allowed and the appellant is permitted to effect substituted service on notice by paper publication in “The New York Ti
- 20 March 2026. 19447/2026 in C.A. No. 2100-2101/2015 For the reasons assigned in the interlocutory applications, it is directed that the notice shall be issued in the daily newspaper 'Newsday' instead of 'New York Times'. Accordingly, applications are allowed. (LOKESH ARORA) (NIKITA SINGH) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
- 29 July 2026. 1. It is an application to bring on record the legal representative of S. Kataria(respondent no. 2). 2. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms Kheyali, Mr. Anis Ahmed Khan, Ms. Rekha Giri, Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Mr. R.K. Kapoor, Ms. Kheyali, Mr. R.K.Kapoor, Mr Vikram Deep Sharma, Mr Rajat Kapoor, Mr R.K.Kapoor, Ms. Kheyali Singh, Mr. Ratna Priya Pradhan Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Ajay Pal, Mr. K.G.Bhagat, Mr. Archana Midha, Mr. Vineet Bhagat, Mr. K.G. Bhagat, Ms. Archna Midha, Mr K.G.Bhagat, Ms Archna Midha, Mr Vineet Bhagat, Mr. K. G. Bhagat, Ms. Manju Bhagat, Ms. Mehaak Jaggi