OM PAL AND ORS. Versus STATE OF UTTARAKHAND ABHISHEK ATREY [R-1] FOR FINAL DISPOSAL] (Crl.A. 109/2017)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · Crl.A. 109/2017

Case Record

Crl.A. 109/2017

OM PAL AND ORS. Versus STATE OF UTTARAKHAND ABHISHEK ATREY [R-1] FOR FINAL DISPOSAL]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN

Crl.A.Bail Criminal appeals

40 PDF renditions· 40 distinct judicial orders· 14 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

OM PAL & ORS. Versus STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR.. Crl.A. 109/2017 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010369552013. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 14 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 27 October 2017 to 24 August 2026.

On 27 October 2017 the order records: Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are not inclined to enlarge the appellants on bail. The application for bail is accordingly disposed of. However, liberty is granted to the appellants to renew the prayer for bail after six months.
On 27 April 2018 the order records: Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are not inclined to entertain the application for bail at this stage.
On 24 September 2021 the order records: 1 We are not inclined to entertain the application for grant of bail. 2 The application for grant of bail is accordingly dismissed.
On 11 November 2022 the order records: 1 I A No 13588 of 2014 application for impleadment is allowed. 2 List the Criminal Appeal for final disposal on 25 November 2022.
On 1 February 2023 the order records: This is an application seeking bail. Learned counsel for the respondent/State vehemently opposes the application.
On 21 August 2026 the order records: List on 24-8-2026 at the end of the Board. (VISHAL ANAND) (POOJA SHARMA) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
On 24 August 2026 the order records: 1. The Criminal Appeal is rejected in terms of the signed order. 2. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

27 October 2017. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are not inclined to enlarge the appellants on bail. The application for bail is accordingly disposed of. However, liberty is granted to the appellants to renew the prayer for bail after six months.
27 April 2018. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are not inclined to entertain the application for bail at this stage.
27 February 2019. We see no reason to grant bail. The Application for Bail is rejected.
19 August 2021. 1 List the Criminal Appeal on 27 August 2021.
27 August 2021. 1 List the Criminal Appeal on 3 September 2021.
3 September 2021. 1 List the Criminal Appeal after two weeks.
24 September 2021. 1 We are not inclined to entertain the application for grant of bail. 2 The application for grant of bail is accordingly dismissed.
11 November 2022. 1 I A No 13588 of 2014 application for impleadment is allowed. 2 List the Criminal Appeal for final disposal on 25 November 2022.
25 November 2022. 1 List the criminal appeal on 5 January 2023.
5 January 2023. 1 List the appeal before an appropriate Bench.
1 February 2023. This is an application seeking bail. Learned counsel for the respondent/State vehemently opposes the application.
14 August 2026. List on 21.8.2026 at the end of the Board for final disposal.
21 August 2026. List on 24-8-2026 at the end of the Board. (VISHAL ANAND) (POOJA SHARMA) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
24 August 2026. 1. The Criminal Appeal is rejected in terms of the signed order. 2. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Nikhar Berry, Mr. Jabar Singh, Mr. S.C. Maheshwari, Mr. Vipul Maheshwari, Mr. Akshay Saxena, Mr. Promad Kumar, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Mr. Parmod Kumar, Dr. I.M. Quudusi, Mr. Pramod Kumar, Mr. Jazib Siddiqui, Ms. Vinita Gupta Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Ameet Singh, Ms. Pareena Swarup, Ms. Sushma Verma, Mr. Praveen Swarup, Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Mr. Chaitanya Siddharth, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Ms. Rachna Gandhi, Ms. Payal Swarup, Mr. Raghvendra Shukla, Mr. K.P. Singh, Mr. R.K. Singh

Relief Sought & Granted

On 24 August 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. The Criminal Appeal is rejected in terms of the signed order. 2. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Bail Criminal appeals

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 24 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 24 Aug 2026

Next hearing

14 Aug 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 14 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 11 other files in the folder were left out.