ODISHA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION XVII LTD. Versus T. S. ALLOYS LTD.. AND ORS. only civil appeal no. 5332 of 2015 is to be listed for fdr renewwal (C.A. 5332/2015)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 5332/2015

Case Record

C.A. 5332/2015

ODISHA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION XVII LTD. Versus T. S. ALLOYS LTD.. AND ORS. only civil appeal no. 5332 of 2015 is to be listed for fdr renewwal

SH. APOORV SINGH

C.A.Direction to public body Civil appeals Municipal law

33 PDF renditions· 33 distinct judicial orders· 16 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

ODISHA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD. Versus T. S. ALLOYS LTD.. & ORS.. C.A. 5332/2015 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010163732015. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 16 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 21 September 2015 to 27 May 2026.

On 21 September 2015 the order records: As prayed for, list the matter after four weeks. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal)
On 23 November 2015 the order records: Issue notice returnable in ten weeks. In the meantime, the appellant shall deposit a sum of Rs.2.5 crores (Rupees two crores and fifty lacs only) with the Registry of this Court within the aforesaid time.
On 26 February 2016 the order records: A letter has been circulated by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1, seeking adjournment for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent No.1 be filed within two weeks from today.
On 31 August 2016 the order records: Respondent nos. 1 and 2 are duly represented. Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent nos. 1 and 2 for filing counter affidavit.
On 15 November 2016 the order records: Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have not filed counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity is declined. Item No.121 None appears for respondent nos. 3 and 4 despite due service.
On 14 May 2018 the order records: FDR be renewed for six months. In the meantime, respondent No.1 shall take steps to withdraw the amount in view of order dated 8.04.2016 of the Hon'ble Court.
On 15 April 2021 the order records: For the reasons stated in the Applications for Substitution, Applications are allowed. Accordingly, the Name of common respondent No.4 in C.A.
On 27 May 2026 the order records: F.D.R. is renewed for a further period of one year from the due date of its maturity. Copy of this Record of proceeding be furnished to the concerned ld. Advocate-on-record for information and compliance.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

21 September 2015. As prayed for, list the matter after four weeks. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal)
23 November 2015. Issue notice returnable in ten weeks. In the meantime, the appellant shall deposit a sum of Rs.2.5 crores (Rupees two crores and fifty lacs only) with the Registry of this Court within the aforesaid time.
11 January 2016. Delay condoned. Issue notice by speed post.
26 February 2016. A letter has been circulated by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1, seeking adjournment for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent No.1 be filed within two weeks from today.
31 August 2016. Respondent nos. 1 and 2 are duly represented. Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent nos. 1 and 2 for filing counter affidavit.
15 November 2016. Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have not filed counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity is declined. Item No.121 None appears for respondent nos. 3 and 4 despite due service.
14 May 2018. FDR be renewed for six months. In the meantime, respondent No.1 shall take steps to withdraw the amount in view of order dated 8.04.2016 of the Hon'ble Court.
26 November 2018. F.D.R. may be renewed for a further period of one year.
3 December 2019. FDR be renewed for a further period of one year from the due date of its maturity.
14 December 2020. F.D.R. be renewed for a further period of one year from the due date of its maturity.
15 April 2021. For the reasons stated in the Applications for Substitution, Applications are allowed. Accordingly, the Name of common respondent No.4 in C.A.
30 November 2021. FDR be renewed for a further period of one year from the due date of its maturity i.e. 27.12.2021.
24 November 2022. FDR be renewed for a further period of one year from the due date of its maturity i.e., 27.12.2022.
5 November 2024. F.D.R. be renewed for a further period of one year from the due date of its maturity.
10 December 2025. F.D.R. is renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of its maturity. Copy of this Record of proceeding be furnished to the concerned ld. Advocate-on-record for information.
27 May 2026. F.D.R. is renewed for a further period of one year from the due date of its maturity. Copy of this Record of proceeding be furnished to the concerned ld. Advocate-on-record for information and compliance.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Raj Kumar Mehta, Mr. Abhishek Upadhyay, Ms. Himanshi Andley, Mr. P.P. Rao, Mr. L.N. Mohapatro, Mr. Abhishek Upadhaya, Mr. Shubhendu Chaterjee, Mr. Shrivignesh, Ms. Ananya Sircar, Mr. Abhishek Upadhaa, Mr Abhishek Upadhyay, Ms. Himansi Andley Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Ashok Kr. Parija, Mr. Ramendra Mohan Patnaik, Mr. Rutwik Panda, Mr. Arnav Dash, Mr. Biswaranja Sahoo, Mrs. Anshu Malik, Mrs Anshu Malik, Ms. Anshu Malik, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Ms. Suyanka Gangopadhyay, Mr Arnav Dash, Mr P.P.Mohanty

Relief Sought & Granted

On 27 May 2026 the latest order on this record says: F.D.R. is renewed for a further period of one year from the due date of its maturity. Copy of this Record of proceeding be furnished to the concerned ld. Advocate-on-record for information and compliance.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Direction to public body Civil appeals Municipal law

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 27 May 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 27 May 2026

Next hearing

10 Dec 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 16 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 2 other files in the folder were left out.