NIZAM DECCAN SUGARS LIMITED AND ANR. Versus THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ORS. (C.A. 213/2022)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 213/2022

Case Record

C.A. 213/2022

NIZAM DECCAN SUGARS LIMITED AND ANR. Versus THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ORS.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

12 PDF renditions· 12 distinct judicial orders· 12 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

ECTION XVII-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 213-214/2022 NIZAM DECCAN SUGARS LIMITED & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS.. C.A. 213/2022 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010307262021. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 12 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 4 February 2022 to 30 January 2026.

On 4 February 2022 the order records: Issue notice returnable in four weeks. Mr. Krishna Dev Jagarlamudi, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.3.
On 24 November 2022 the order records: No one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 to 12, despite due service of notice. Four weeks time, is granted to Respondent No. 3, to file counter affidavit.
On 17 February 2023 the order records: Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Respondent No.3 has failed to file counter affidavit, despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined.
On 6 April 2023 the order records: Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are granted four weeks' time, as last opportunity, for filing counter affidavit. Opportunity to respondent No.3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.
On 15 May 2023 the order records: Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have failed to file counter affidavit, despite last opportunity having been granted. Ld. counsel for the said respondents prays for and is granted two weeks' more time as last and final opportunity for filing counter affidavit.
On 28 July 2023 the order records: Respondent nos. 1,2 and 10 to 12 have failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined. Opportunity to respondent no.3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.
On 6 September 2023 the order records: Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 to 3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Item no.19 Service is complete on respondent nos. 10 to 12 but none has entered appearance(Defects in the vakalatnama have not been cured despite last opportunity granted and opportunity to file counter affidavit has already been
On 30 January 2026 the order records: 1.I.A No.26558 of 2026 is allowed. 2.Accordingly, the appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the signed order which is placed on the file.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

4 February 2022. Issue notice returnable in four weeks. Mr. Krishna Dev Jagarlamudi, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.3.
24 November 2022. No one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 to 12, despite due service of notice. Four weeks time, is granted to Respondent No. 3, to file counter affidavit.
12 January 2023. Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 4 to 12.
17 February 2023. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Respondent No.3 has failed to file counter affidavit, despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined.
6 April 2023. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are granted four weeks' time, as last opportunity, for filing counter affidavit. Opportunity to respondent No.3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.
15 May 2023. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have failed to file counter affidavit, despite last opportunity having been granted. Ld. counsel for the said respondents prays for and is granted two weeks' more time as last and final opportunity for filing counter affidavit.
28 July 2023. Respondent nos. 1,2 and 10 to 12 have failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined. Opportunity to respondent no.3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.
6 September 2023. Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 to 3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Item no.19 Service is complete on respondent nos. 10 to 12 but none has entered appearance(Defects in the vakalatnama have not been cured despite last opportunity granted and opportunity to file counter affidavit has already been
3 October 2023. 1 Application seeking correction of memo of parties in respect of respondent No 9 is allowed.
30 October 2023. Opportunity to respondent nos.1 to 3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Item no.18 Respondent no.9 has filed counter affidavit.
23 January 2026. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that interlocutory application for withdrawal of the appeal has been filed in the Registry yesterday which has not been placed on record. 2. As prayed, list this matter on 30.01.2026.
30 January 2026. 1.I.A No.26558 of 2026 is allowed. 2.Accordingly, the appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the signed order which is placed on the file.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Paras Kuhad, Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Mr. K.V. Girish Chowdary, Mr. Manu Aggarwal, Ms. Kanika Sharma, Ms. Tatini Basu, Mr. Kumar Shashank, Mr. K. V. Girish Chowdary, Mr K.V.Girish Chowdary, Ms Nitipriya Kar, Mr. D. Satya Sai Sumanth, Ms. Nitipriya Kar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Ritin Rai, Mr. Krishna Dev Jagarlamudi, Mr. T.P.S. Harsha, Ms. Gunjan Mathur, Mr. Sai Kaushal, Ms. Inderdeep Kaur Raina, Ms. Ishani Jammula, Mr. V. Aravind, Mr. Amit K. Nain, Mr. PBA Srinivasan, Mr. Parth Tandon, Ms. Prerana Sabharwal

Relief Sought & Granted

On 30 January 2026 the order records: Accordingly, the appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the signed order which is placed on the file.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 30 Jan 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 30 Jan 2026

Final disposition

Accordingly, the appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the signed order which is placed on the file.

Important procedural note

Written only from 12 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.