- 20 May 2022. Permission to file appeal is granted. Learned Counsel for the appellants submits that the component of gratuity, which has been assessed by the adjudicating authority has to be paid in full and that has been protected under Section 36(4) of the t he Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Though under the resolution plan, the
- 12 August 2022. Office report indicates that respondent nos. 2 and 3 are served. So far as respondent no. 1 is concerned, unserved notice has been received with post remarks 'left'. Let fresh notice be issued in respect of respondent no. 1.
- 9 November 2022. Ld. Counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted four weeks' time to file affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent No.1. Service is complete on respondent Nos.2 and 3 but none has entered appearance.
- 9 December 2022. Ld. Counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted four weeks' time, as last opportunity, to file affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent No.1. Service is complete on respondent Nos.2 and 3 but none has entered appearance.
- 30 January 2023. Ld. Counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of the unserved respondent No.1. Service is complete on respondent Nos.2 and 3 but none has entered appearance.
- 13 March 2023. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time, as last opportunity, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of the unserved respondent No.1. Service is complete on respondent Nos.2 and 3 but none has entered appearance.
- 24 April 2023. Service is complete on respondent Nos.2 and 3 but none has entered appearance. Despite last opportunity having been granted, Ld.Counsel for the appellant has neither taken fresh steps nor filed fresh particulars in respect of respondent No.1.
- 3 October 2023. 1 Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant states that the order passed by the Registrar on 24 April 2023 for compliance of service on respondent No 1 is not correct, for the appellant has taken steps for effecting service upon respondent No 1, who, in fact, already stand served. 2 Let the counsel for the appellant
- 9 January 2024. Despite service of notice on respondent Nos.2 and 3, there is no appearance on their behalf. As per office report, Respondent No.1 (General Manager) has refused to accept the notice, thus service is deemed complete on said respondent.
- 1 March 2024. Despite service of notice on respondent Nos.2 and 3, there is no appearance on their behalf. As per office report, notice issued to respondent No.1 is returned with postal remarks ”Refused”. Thus, service is deemed to be complete on the respondent and there is no appearance.
- 24 January 2025. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants prays for and is granted eight weeks' time to file rejoinder affidavit. List this matter after eight weeks.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. R. C. Kaushik, Mr. R.K. Gupta, Mr. Asuthosh Sharma, Ms. Gunjan Sharma, Mr. Asutosh Sharma, Mr. Bikash Chandra, Mr. Shiv Nath, Mr. Rajeev Kumar Deora, Mr. Krishna Kant Sharma, Mr. Sumit Kumar, Mr. R.S. Mishra, Mr. Buddha Deo Prasad Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Aayush Sharma, Mr. Minish Kaushik, Mr. Manish Kaushik, Mr. Satya Kam Sharma
