- 21 April 2022. Subject to the petitioner depositing 50 % of the amount before the MACT, in terms of the order passed by the High Court dated 06.10.2021, within six weeks from today, notice be issued and there will be stay of recovery of further balance amount. (NISHA KHULBEY) (RENU KAPOOR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
- 6 December 2022. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of the unserved respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 and 5. Ld. Counsel makes request to serve the said respondents through the concerned Court (MACT Court). Allowed. Details of the concerned Court be fur
- 16 March 2023. Ld. counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time as final opportunity to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent nos.1,2,4 and 5. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks' time as final opportunity to take appropriate steps in respect of respondent no.3(dead).
- 27 April 2023. As per office report, ld. Counsel for the petitioner has neither taken fresh steps alongwith fresh particulars in respect of respondent nos.1,2,4 and 5 nor taken appropriate steps in respect of deceased respondent no.3 despite last opportunity having been granted. However, ld. Counsel for the petitioner requests for on
- 13 July 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to serve the respondents. Under these circumstances, let the matter be listed before Court for appropriate orders.
- 9 May 2024. IA No. 58119/2024 The application seeking deletion of Respondent No.3 is allowed. Let amended memo of parties be filed. IA No. 56755/2024 and IA No. 56739/2024 For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the same are allowed. Steps for effecting substituted service by way of publication in respect of Respondent Nos.
- 30 September 2024. Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 & 5 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Respondent No. 3 has been deleted vide order dated 9.5.2024 of the Hon'ble Judge in chambers.
- 15 May 2025. 1. The Tribunal took the income of the deceased to be Rs.30,000/-(Rupees thirty thousand) per annum but the High Court took it as Rs.15,000/-(Rupees fifteen thousand) per month in making the Award. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
- 23 August 2026. No settlement could be arrived at between the parties concerned. 2. Accordingly, the matter is referred back to the appropriate Bench.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Rohit K. Sinha, Mr. T. Mahipal, Mr. Rohit Kumar Sinha, Mr. Rohit, Mr. Rohit Sinha, Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Ms. Sampa Sengupta Ray, Mr. Indrajeet Singh, Mr. Indrajeet, Mr. Surya Kamal Mishra, Mr. Snehil Jha
