- 8 September 2017. As prayed for, list on 11.9.2017.
- 11 September 2017. As prayed for, list on 18.9.2017.
- 18 September 2017. Learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the petitioner argued that the High Court has recorded a wrong finding in the impugned order that the marks obtained by Respondent No.1 were more and he was senior also than those who were promoted. Let a comparative statement of marks obtained by candidates be placed
- 9 October 2017. List on 13.10.2017.
- 13 October 2017. List this matter on 15th November, 2017.
- 15 November 2017. As prayed for, list after a week.
- 24 November 2017. List on 7th December, 2017.
- 7 December 2017. Leave granted. List the matter in the month of March, 2018.
- 28 March 2019. List in the next week.
- 4 April 2019. Mr. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, learned counsel for Respondent No. 1 is not present today. Issue notice to the learned counsel for his presence in Court on the next date of hearing. List on 23.04.2019.
- 27 January 2025. The matter be listed before a Bench of which one of us (Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J.) is not a member.
- 16 April 2026. IA No. 249366/2025 No case to entertain the application for early hearing is made out. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. P.S. Narasimha, Mr. Dinesh Mathur, Ms. Priyanka Barti, Ms. Priyanka Bharti, Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Mr. Jai Bansal, Mr. Kaushik Poddar, Ms. Esha Goyal Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Prashat R. Dahat, Mr. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Ms. Sunita Sharma, Ms. Pragya Baghel, Ms. Anil Katiyar, Mr. Prashant R. Dahat, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Mr. Kailash Vasudev, Mr. A.K. Srivastava, Mr. Puneet Yadav, Mr. Ashok K. Srivastava, Mrs. Anil Katiyar
