- 28 November 2024. Issue notice, returnable in six weeks. 2. In the meantime, there shall be stay of further proceedings transfer of the case HMA Act Case No.D.M.C.217 of 2022, titled as “Sh. Harsh Vs. Smt. Neetu”, pending in the Court of Additional District Judge, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana.
- 17 January 2025. Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for the petitioner, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, for issuing notice to sole respondent. Dasti service, in addition, as prayed is allowed. Let affidavit of dasti service be filed within four weeks. List again on 20.02.2025.
- 20 February 2025. Sole respondent is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. After expiry of four weeks, Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules as the Hon'ble Court on 28.11.2024 has directed to issue notice, returnable in six weeks.
- 27 March 2025. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties submitted that the matter be referred to mediation before the Supreme Court Mediation Centre (SCMC). Accordingly, the matter is referred to the SCMC. The parties are directed to appear before the learned Mediator on 15.04.2025 at 02:30 p.m. 2. Thereafter, liberty is grante
- 24 July 2025. Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. Having regard to the aforesaid, by way of indulgence, the matter be listed on 31.07.2025.
- 25 November 2025. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties submit that mediation has twice failed before the Courts in the State of Chhattisgarh. However, it appears from the submissions made that though the petitioner-wife is ready to go and live with the respondent at Charkhi Dadri in the State of Haryana, to which the responden
- 10 February 2026. Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no. 1 has already been filed. Service is complete on respondent nos. 2 to 5 but none has entered appearance.
- 16 February 2026. 1. Tag with Transfer Petition (C) No.3069/2024. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall effect service on the unserved respondent no.6. Dasti service is permitted.
- 26 February 2026. Learned counsel for the parties submit that pursuant to this Court's intervention, the matter being sent for mediation, the parties have started living together since last one week and as per the interim arrangement, they have agreed to stay together for three months. Accordingly, it is prayed that the Court may adjour
- 15 July 2026. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The parties are also present in Court, duly identified by their respective counsel.
- 19 August 2026. The matter could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. 2. However, interim order passed by this Court on 28.11.2024 to continue till the next date of listing.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Aditya Vashisht, Mr. Mohd. Abid Sheikh, Ms. Neelam Singh, Mr. Rishabh Bhardwaj, Ms. Tanya Aggarwal, Mr. Akul Mahendru, Mr. Tilak Vij, Mr. Kailash Uday Kapoor Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Snehasish Mukherjee, Mr. Maneesh, Mr. Harish Kaushik, Mr. Piyush Malik, Dr. Harish Kaushik, Mr. Asit Kumar Roy, Mr. Krishan Mahajan, Mr. Kumar Prasoon Ranjan, Ms. Chanchal Kaushik, Mr. Mohd Mohsin Raja, Mr. Bhaskar Malakar, Mr. Mohit Gemini
