NEENA VIKRAM VERMA @ NEENA VERMA Versus SURESH CHANDRA BHANDARI AND ORS. (C.A. 1014/2017)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 1014/2017

Case Record

C.A. 1014/2017

NEENA VIKRAM VERMA @ NEENA VERMA Versus SURESH CHANDRA BHANDARI AND ORS.

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

11 PDF renditions· 11 distinct judicial orders· 9 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

NEENA VIKRAM VERMA @ NEENA VERMA Versus SURESH CHANDRA BHANDARI & ORS.. C.A. 1014/2017 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010001492017. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 9 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 3 November 2017 to 21 May 2026.

On 3 November 2017 the order records: Respondent Nos.1 to 6, 9, 10 and 12 to 14 have been served but no one has entered appearance. Respondent No.8 has refused to accept notice, as such, service is deemed to be complete but no one has put in appearance.
On 15 January 2018 the order records: Respondent No.11 has expired. The Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that he is going to file application for deletion of respondent No.11. Be filed within four weeks. Spare copies for service of respondent Nos.7 and 15 have been filed but fresh addresses have not been furnished. Two weeks' time, as last opportunity
On 12 March 2018 the order records: Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to the Ld. Counsel for the appellant for filing application for deletion of the deceased respondent No.11. Spare copies for service of respondent Nos.7 and 15 have been filed but fresh addresses of the said respondents have not been furnished.
On 16 April 2018 the order records: Application filed for deletion of respondent No.11 be processed as per rules. Application for substituted service in respect of respondent Nos.7 and 15 is allowed. Notice be issued immediately. Proof of publication be filed within four weeks.
On 13 July 2018 the order records: Ld. Counsel for the appellant submitted that affidavit with proof of publication in respect of respondent nos. 7 and 15 will be filed during the course of the day. List again on 25.7.2018.
On 10 September 2018 the order records: Application for deletion of the name of respondent no. 11 from the array of parties is allowed at the risk and responsibility of the appellant. Cause title be amended accordingly.
On 29 November 2018 the order records: Respondent no.1 is duly represented. Service is complete on respondent nos. 2 to 10 and 12 to 15 but none has entered appearance.
On 21 May 2026 the order records: The Civil Appeals are dismissed as infructuous in terms of the signed order. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

3 November 2017. Respondent Nos.1 to 6, 9, 10 and 12 to 14 have been served but no one has entered appearance. Respondent No.8 has refused to accept notice, as such, service is deemed to be complete but no one has put in appearance.
8 January 2018. File not received. Be listed on 15th of January, 2018.
15 January 2018. Respondent No.11 has expired. The Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that he is going to file application for deletion of respondent No.11. Be filed within four weeks. Spare copies for service of respondent Nos.7 and 15 have been filed but fresh addresses have not been furnished. Two weeks' time, as last opportunity
12 March 2018. Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to the Ld. Counsel for the appellant for filing application for deletion of the deceased respondent No.11. Spare copies for service of respondent Nos.7 and 15 have been filed but fresh addresses of the said respondents have not been furnished.
16 April 2018. Application filed for deletion of respondent No.11 be processed as per rules. Application for substituted service in respect of respondent Nos.7 and 15 is allowed. Notice be issued immediately. Proof of publication be filed within four weeks.
13 July 2018. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submitted that affidavit with proof of publication in respect of respondent nos. 7 and 15 will be filed during the course of the day. List again on 25.7.2018.
10 September 2018. Application for deletion of the name of respondent no. 11 from the array of parties is allowed at the risk and responsibility of the appellant. Cause title be amended accordingly.
29 November 2018. Respondent no.1 is duly represented. Service is complete on respondent nos. 2 to 10 and 12 to 15 but none has entered appearance.
21 May 2026. The Civil Appeals are dismissed as infructuous in terms of the signed order. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Navin Prakash, Ms. Meetu Singh, Ms Meetu Singh, Mr Abhishek Vikas Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Varun K. Chopra, Mr. Gurtej Pal Singh, Ms. Aswathi M.k., Mr Dharmendar Kumar Yadav, Mr Ashutosh Kumar Srivastava

Relief Sought & Granted

On 21 May 2026 the order records: The Civil Appeals are dismissed as infructuous in terms of the signed order.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 21 May 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 21 May 2026

Final disposition

The Civil Appeals are dismissed as infructuous in terms of the signed order.

Important procedural note

Written only from 9 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 1 other files in the folder were left out.