- 12 May 2015. Service of the sole respondent is complete. None of the parties has filed the statement of case.
- 22 March 2023. In view of the letter circulated on behalf of the appellants seeking adjournment and the reasons stated therein, the appeal will not be taken up for hearing in next two weeks. (DEEPAK GUGLANI) (R.S. NARAYANAN) AR-cum-PS
- 17 May 2024. Service of notice of alternative arrangement(counsel designated as Senior Advocate) is complete on the sole respondent but none has entered appearance. As per office report, both appellants have refused to accept the notice of alternative arrangement(counsel designated as Senior Advocate), as such, service shall be dee
- 19 July 2024. Service of notice for alternative arrangement (counsel designated as Sr. Advocate) is complete on the sole respondent but none has entered appearance. Service of notice for alternative arrangement (counsel designated as Sr. Advocate) is complete on both the appellants but none has entered appearance, despite await appe
- 28 August 2024. Learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that she recently has been instructed to appear on behalf of the appellant(s) and prays for two weeks to file vakalatnama. Accordingly, two weeks' time is granted as prayed for.
- 15 July 2026. 1. The appeal is dismissed in terms of the Signed Order placed on the file. 2. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Raghavendra S. Srivatsa, Mr. Ranu Purohit, Mr. Amit Pai, Ms. Pankhuri Bhardwaj, Ms. Ranu Purohit Advocates — Respondents: Mr. S. N. Bhat
