- 17 September 2024. Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment is allowed. Leave to file appeal is granted.
- 3 October 2024. Delay in filing spare copies is condoned. Issue notices immediately. List the matter before Hon'ble Court on 21.10.2024 in light of Hon'ble Court's order dt. 17.09.2024.
- 21 October 2024. We grant time of four weeks to file the counter affidavits. The rejoinder affidavits, if any, to be filed within two weeks thereafter.
- 13 December 2024. List for hearing the parties on the prayer for interim relief on 3rd February, 2025. CONMT.PET.(C) No. 860/2024 in C.A. No. 10656/2024 Issue notice to the first respondent/alleged contemnor, returnable on 3rd February, 2025.
- 3 February 2025. Time is sought on behalf of the Rail Land Development Authority to file a counter affidavit in the Contempt Petition. We grant time of three weeks to the Rail Land Development Authority to file a common affidavit in these matters. List on 3rd March, 2025.
- 3 March 2025. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. It is obvious that the interim relief granted under this Court's dated 17th September, 2024 will remain confined to the land/property subject matter of Original Application No.697 of 2023.
- 24 March 2025. No orders.
- 28 April 2025. IA No.104621/2025 – FOR EARLY HEARING List the application in July, 2025. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU) AR-CUM-PS
- 14 July 2025. 1. Admit. 2. List for final hearing on 23.07.2025.
- 6 August 2025. Heard in-part. List the matters on 13th August, 2025.
- 28 August 2025. List these matters on 10th September, 2025.
- 17 September 2025. List these matters in the week commencing 17th November, 2025.
- 20 November 2025. 1. Heard in-part. 2. Re-list the matters tomorrow i.e. on 21st November, 2025.
- 21 November 2025. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 1 December 2025. 1. Arguments concluded. 2. Judgment reserved.
- 20 March 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 20 March 2026. 1. Hon'ble Mr.Justice Augustine George Masih pronounced a reportable judgment of the Bench comprising Hon'ble Mr.Justice Dipankar Datta and His Lordship. 2. The relevant portion of the judgment is extracted as under:
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Mr. Ankur Sood, Mr. Madhav Gupta, Mr. Manan Verma, Mrs. Madhur Panjwani, Mr. Dhaman Trivedi, Mr. Prashant, Mr Dhaman Trivedi, Ms. Trisha Chandran, Mr. Gopal Sankarnarayanan, Mr. Romila Mandal, Ms. Romila Mandal Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Vivek Kohli, Mr. Sameer Abhayankar, Ms. Bhavya Bhatia, Ms. Aditi Pundir, Mr. Abhishek Bhatra, Mr. Chirag Shroff, Ms. Mahima C. Shroff, Mr. Dhananjay Kataria, Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Mr. Mahesh Thakur, Mr. Keith Varghese, Mr. Ranvijay Singh Chandel
