- 4 November 2024. We direct an appropriate senior officer of the appellant to file an affidavit setting out whether the appellant is willing to create a pond which will have adequate water in the vicinity of the pond which has been adversely affected due to construction of road by the appellant. If the appellant is willing to undertake
- 9 December 2024. Application seeking exemption from filing a certified copy of the impugned order is allowed. Delay condoned.
- 27 January 2025. We have perused the affidavit of Shri Dhiraj Singh, Project Director of the appellant. A report on creation of new pond at Vill Kiranj District, Nuh Haryana prepared by M/s Vulenviro Design Solutions LPP is annexed. We direct the appellant to immediately take steps for creating a new pond in terms of the report. We dir
- 24 February 2025. In terms of the earlier orders, now an affidavit dated 17 th February, 2025 has been filed by the appellant/National Highways Authority of India giving assurance to complete the work of creating a pond within a period of three months. We take the statements made in the said affidavit on record. In fact, it is stated th
- 28 March 2025. We are informed that the first respondent has filed an affidavit. To be listed on 17 th April, 2025 to consider the affidavit.
- 17 April 2025. The first respondent has raised several issues about the manner in which the appellant is making a pond. The stand of the appellant is that the work has been complete. We direct the Haryana Pond and Waste Water Authority to look into the suggestions made by the first respondent. The Authority will also take into consid
- 25 July 2025. 1. Mr. K.M. Nataraj, learned Additional Solicitor General representing the petitioner-National Highway Authority of India seeks and is granted two weeks' time to file its response to the Report filed by the Haryana Pond and Waste Water Authority in compliance with the order of this Court dated 17 th April, 2. Any other
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. K.M. Nataraj, Mr. Sahil Monga, Ms. Alekhya Sattigeri, Mr. Alekhya Sattigeri, Mr. Vinayak Sharma Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Ms. Pragya Upadhyay, Ms. Drishti Saraf, Mr. Abhishek Gautam, Mr. Shubham Soni, Mr. Vikramaditya Chouhan, Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Mr. Nikunj Gupta, Ms. Aakanksha, Ms. Ishika Gupta, Mr. Sarthak Arya, Ms. Drishti Rawal