NATIONAL FEDERATION OF SOCIETIES FOR FAST PIL-W JUSTICE AND ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1], GUNTUR PRAMOD KUMAR[R-2], DISHA SINGH [R-3], SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4], [R-27], MANISH KUMAR[R-5], ANKITA SHARMA[R-6], [R-6], SURBHI KAPOOR [R-7], DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-8], SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[R-9], YADAV NARENDER SINGH[R-10], PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN[R-11], SHANTANU SAGAR[R-12], V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-13], NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-14], SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA[R-15], AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-16], PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-17], AVIJIT MANI TRIPATHI[R-18], ANANDO MUKHERJEE[R-19], K. ENATOLI SEMA[R-20], [R-50], [IMPL], SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY[R-21], NUPUR KUMAR[R-22], NIDHI JASWAL[R-23], SAMEER ABHYANKAR[R-24], T. HARISH KUMAR[R-25], DEVINA SEHGAL[R-26], ADARSH UPADHYAY[R-28], MANAN VERMA[R-29], [R-29], MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-30], RAMESH BABU M. R.[R-32], CHARU AMBWANI[R-33], PRASHANT SHRIKANT KENJALE[R-34], KUNAL CHATTERJI[R-35], NIDHI MITTAL[R-36], SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-37], VISHAKHA[R-38], SNEHA KALITA[R-39], MANISHA AMBWANI[R-40], ABHISHEK SINGH[R-41], K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA[R-42], V. K. BIJU[R-43], R. AYYAM PERUMAL[R-44], ARJUN GARG[R-45], SANJAI KUMAR PATHAK[R-46], MAHESH THAKUR[R-47], KUMAR MIHIR[R-47], NIRANJAN SAHU[R-48], ASMITA SINGH[R-49], MUKUL KUMAR[R-51], ENAKSHI MUKHOPADHYAY SIDDHANTA[R-52], B. SHRAVANTH SHANKER[R-53], AMIT SHARMA[R-54], RADHIKA GAUTAM[R-55] VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[IMPL], SHREEKANT NEELAPPA TERDAL[IMPL], K. R. CHITRA[IMPL], JOSE ABRAHAM[IMPL], GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[IMPL], CHIRAG M. SHROFF[IMPL], ARAVINDH Shri Nidhesh Gupta, Senior Counsel (A.C.) and Ms. Suhasini Sen, counsel (A.C.) ADDITIONAL COSTS FILING INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT (W.P.(C) 1067/2019)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · W.P.(C) 1067/2019

Case Record

W.P.(C) 1067/2019

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF SOCIETIES FOR FAST PIL-W JUSTICE AND ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1], GUNTUR PRAMOD KUMAR[R-2], DISHA SINGH [R-3], SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4], [R-27], MANISH KUMAR[R-5], ANKITA SHARMA[R-6], [R-6], SURBHI KAPOOR [R-7], DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-8], SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[R-9], YADAV NARENDER SINGH[R-10], PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN[R-11], SHANTANU SAGAR[R-12], V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-13], NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-14], SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA[R-15], AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-16], PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-17], AVIJIT MANI TRIPATHI[R-18], ANANDO MUKHERJEE[R-19], K. ENATOLI SEMA[R-20], [R-50], [IMPL], SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY[R-21], NUPUR KUMAR[R-22], NIDHI JASWAL[R-23], SAMEER ABHYANKAR[R-24], T. HARISH KUMAR[R-25], DEVINA SEHGAL[R-26], ADARSH UPADHYAY[R-28], MANAN VERMA[R-29], [R-29], MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-30], RAMESH BABU M. R.[R-32], CHARU AMBWANI[R-33], PRASHANT SHRIKANT KENJALE[R-34], KUNAL CHATTERJI[R-35], NIDHI MITTAL[R-36], SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-37], VISHAKHA[R-38], SNEHA KALITA[R-39], MANISHA AMBWANI[R-40], ABHISHEK SINGH[R-41], K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA[R-42], V. K. BIJU[R-43], R. AYYAM PERUMAL[R-44], ARJUN GARG[R-45], SANJAI KUMAR PATHAK[R-46], MAHESH THAKUR[R-47], KUMAR MIHIR[R-47], NIRANJAN SAHU[R-48], ASMITA SINGH[R-49], MUKUL KUMAR[R-51], ENAKSHI MUKHOPADHYAY SIDDHANTA[R-52], B. SHRAVANTH SHANKER[R-53], AMIT SHARMA[R-54], RADHIKA GAUTAM[R-55] VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[IMPL], SHREEKANT NEELAPPA TERDAL[IMPL], K. R. CHITRA[IMPL], JOSE ABRAHAM[IMPL], GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[IMPL], CHIRAG M. SHROFF[IMPL], ARAVINDH Shri Nidhesh Gupta, Senior Counsel (A.C.) and Ms. Suhasini Sen, counsel (A.C.) ADDITIONAL COSTS FILING INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN

W.P.(C)Writs Writ petitions Civil

15 PDF renditions· 15 distinct judicial orders· 15 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF SOCIETIES FOR FAST JUSTICE & ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.. W.P.(C) 1067/2019 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010269592019. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 15 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 2 September 2019 to 18 December 2024.

On 2 September 2019 the order records: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Issue notice.
On 29 January 2020 the order records: At the commencement of hearing, Mr. Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has placed before us State-wise Administrative Units Information in tabular form, showing the steps taken by various States for establishing and functioning of Gram Nyayalayas under the Gram Nyayalayas Act, Lear
On 11 February 2020 the order records: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. So far as the States which have filed their respective counter affidavits after order dated 29-1-2020 passed by this Court, they are directed to pay the costs of Rs.1,00,000/- immediately.
On 16 October 2023 the order records: 1. The amount of Rs.11,00,000/- (Rupees Eleven Lakh Only), lying with the Registry is directed to be deposited in a Fixed Deposit Receipt in a nationalized bank, initially for a period of one year, which shall be renewed from time to time. 2. Mr. Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) has tendered a ch
On 12 July 2024 the order records: 1. Vide order dated 29.01.2020, this Court had issued various directions. 2. A period of four and a half years have elapsed therefrom.
On 11 September 2024 the order records: 1. Taking into consideration the importance of the matter, we request Shri Nidhesh Gupta, learned senior counsel to assist the Court as Amicus Curiae. 2. We also request Ms. Suhasini Sen, learned counsel, to appear along with Shri Nidhesh Gupta, learned senior counsel, as an Amicus Curiae to assist the Court.
On 16 October 2024 the order records: 1. In pursuance to the order passed by this Court on 11.09.2024, the State Governments/Union Territories and the High Courts have filed their respective affidavits. 2. Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, learned Amicus Curiae has prepared a chart pointing out the position with regard to each of the States. The chart contains the names
On 18 December 2024 the order records: 1. Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, learned Amicus Curiae states that after the last order passed by this court on 16.10.2024, some of the States have filed their affidavits whereas some of them have yet not filed the same. 2. Learned Amicus Curiae submits that the stand of various State Governments/Union Territories would be divide

Issues Before Court

Procedural History

2 September 2019. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Issue notice.
18 October 2019. Heard Mr.K.K. Venugopal, learned Attorney General for India. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of various States are directed to file their affidavits before 18.12.2019. We direct the Union of India as well to file its affidavit before the said date.
29 January 2020. At the commencement of hearing, Mr. Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has placed before us State-wise Administrative Units Information in tabular form, showing the steps taken by various States for establishing and functioning of Gram Nyayalayas under the Gram Nyayalayas Act, Lear
5 February 2020. Learned counsel appearing for the State of Telangana mentioned the matter in the morning stating that the time granted to file counter affidavit may be extended till Monday, the 10 th February, As prayed, the time is extended till 10 th February, 2020 to file counter affidavit. In the meantime, the counsel for the Stat
11 February 2020. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. So far as the States which have filed their respective counter affidavits after order dated 29-1-2020 passed by this Court, they are directed to pay the costs of Rs.1,00,000/- immediately.
28 July 2020. The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the State of Goa and perused the Office Report dated 2472020.
7 November 2022. A letter has been circulated by learned counsel for respondent No.21-State of Odisha seeking adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty. Issue notice on IA No.36162/2022.
14 November 2022. Application for impleadment to implead High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla is allowed. High Courts are directed to make parties to this Writ Petition.
15 December 2022. Eight weeks' time is granted to file Status Report/reply by all the State Governments and the High Courts. List after eight weeks.
16 October 2023. 1. The amount of Rs.11,00,000/- (Rupees Eleven Lakh Only), lying with the Registry is directed to be deposited in a Fixed Deposit Receipt in a nationalized bank, initially for a period of one year, which shall be renewed from time to time. 2. Mr. Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) has tendered a ch
14 May 2024. List after ensuing summer vacation. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (ANJU KAPOOR) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
12 July 2024. 1. Vide order dated 29.01.2020, this Court had issued various directions. 2. A period of four and a half years have elapsed therefrom.
11 September 2024. 1. Taking into consideration the importance of the matter, we request Shri Nidhesh Gupta, learned senior counsel to assist the Court as Amicus Curiae. 2. We also request Ms. Suhasini Sen, learned counsel, to appear along with Shri Nidhesh Gupta, learned senior counsel, as an Amicus Curiae to assist the Court.
16 October 2024. 1. In pursuance to the order passed by this Court on 11.09.2024, the State Governments/Union Territories and the High Courts have filed their respective affidavits. 2. Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, learned Amicus Curiae has prepared a chart pointing out the position with regard to each of the States. The chart contains the names
18 December 2024. 1. Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, learned Amicus Curiae states that after the last order passed by this court on 16.10.2024, some of the States have filed their affidavits whereas some of them have yet not filed the same. 2. Learned Amicus Curiae submits that the stand of various State Governments/Union Territories would be divide
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Mr. Rahul Gupta, Ms. Neha Rathi, Mr. Alice Raj, Mr. Lalit Kumar, Mr. Ragul Gupta, Mr. Luma Kanta Bhandari, Mr. Lumakanta Bhandari, Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Ms. Japeneent Kaur, Ms. V. Gujral, Mr. Bikram Dwivedi Advocates — Respondents: Mr. K.K.Venugopal, Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Ms. V.Mohana, Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Mr. A.K.Sharma, Mr. S.R. Singh, Mr. Adarsh Upadhyay, Mr. Harsh Pratap Shahi, Mr. G. N. Reddy, Mr. T. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Ms. Sujatha Bagadhi, Mr. Gopal Singh

Relief Sought & Granted

On 18 December 2024 the latest order on this record says: 1. Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, learned Amicus Curiae states that after the last order passed by this court on 16.10.2024, some of the States have filed their affidavits whereas some of them have yet not filed the same. 2. Learned Amicus Curiae submits that the stand of various State Governments/Union Territories would be divide

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Writs Writ petitions Civil

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 18 Dec 2024

Latest development

Latest recorded event 18 Dec 2024

Next hearing

12 Sept 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 15 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.