- 26 February 2015. The office report is that Ld.counsel for the appellants and the Ld.counsel for the respondents have failed to file the statement of case, although they have been notified to do so by letter dated 16.05.2013 of this Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the appellant does n ot file
- 17 August 2023. None is present on behalf of the appellants. By way of last opportunity, re-list after three weeks.
- 13 May 2025. Mr. Vineet Bhagat, Ld. Counsel for other respondents has filed an application for substitution in respect of deceased Respondent Nos. 1, 3, 8, 10 and 11, which is defective. Four weeks time is granted to cure the defects. Remaining respondents are duly represented.
- 6 August 2025. Respondent nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 & 12 are duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks time as last opportunity to cure the defects in the application seeking substitution of the legal representatives of deceased respondent nos. 1, 3, 8, 10 and 11.
- 16 September 2025. Respondent Nos.2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 & 12 are duly represented. Respondent Nos. 1, 3, 8, 10 and 11 are dead. Ld. counsel has failed to cure the defects in the application seeking substitution, despite the grant of last opportunity.
- 17 April 2026. IA Nos. 99676, 99677, 143453 and 143454 of 2025 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and perused the applications. 2. Considering the reasons mentioned therein, the legal heirs of the deceased respondent Nos. 1, 3, 8, 10 and 11 are permitted to be brought on record.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, Mr. Sarvjit Pratap Singh, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Vineet Bhagat, Ms. Manju Bhagat, Ms. Archna Midha, Mr. Mohit Gulati, Mrs. Manju Bhagat, Mrs. Archna Midha, Mr. Amartya, Mr. Mansoor Ali, Mr. S. Islam, Mr. Z. K. Faizan, Mr. Harshad Gupta, Mr. Aksveer Singh Saggu