- 3 August 2015. Ld.counsel for the appellant has stated that he does not need to file the statement of case. This is taken on record. Ld.counsel for respondent shall be at liberty to file the statement of case, within a period of 35 days. List the matter again on 13.10.2015.
- 24 August 2015. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. The application for directions is dismissed.
- 13 October 2015. The office report indicates that the Learned counsel for the appellant does not wish to file the statement of case. Resp ondent has failed to file the statement of case within the period stipulated in the order dated 3.8.2015 of this Court. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court
- 18 September 2024. Record stands allowed. It is submitted that the party has taken 'No Objection Certificate' from the counsel concerned.
- 21 February 2025. Service of notice is complete on the sole respondent. 2. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Court for further consideration on an early date.
- 5 May 2025. The interlocutory application filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking discharge. It is stated that the sole appellant is dead and inspite of all of his best efforts he is not able to bring his legal representatives also. 2. Accordingly, the interlocutory application is allowed. Let the court notice be i
- 23 September 2025. As per office report dated 27.06.2025, fresh notice for alternative arrangement could not be served upon sole appellant. It has returned back with postal remarks “Item returned no such person in the address”. 2. Learned counsel for sole respondent submitted that the appellant has died on 25.11.2023. The respondent noti
- 5 January 2026. 1. Learned counsel for the respondent states that he would place on record the Death Certificate of the appellant, who according to his information has expired on 25.11.2023 and that his wife has already vacated the premises on 09.12.2023. 2. List on 12.01.2026.
- 12 January 2026. 1. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution in terms of the signed order, which is placed on the file. 2. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Kunal Chatterji, Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Mr. Rohit Bansal, Ms. Mrinalini Mukherjee, Mr. Varij Nayan Mishra Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Nikilesh Ramachandran, Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Mr. Rakesh Singh, Ms. Anwesha Saha, Mr. Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi, Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, Mr. Anindo Mukherjee, Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Mr. Saurabh Bhushan, Mr. Aninda Mukherjee, Ms. Aayushi
