NABAKISHORE RAJGURU MOHAPATRA Versus THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER RAYAGADA (C.A. 3629/2023)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 3629/2023

Case Record

C.A. 3629/2023

NABAKISHORE RAJGURU MOHAPATRA Versus THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER RAYAGADA

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI

C.A.Speed up proceedings Civil appeals Land Land Acquisition

35 PDF renditions· 35 distinct judicial orders· 9 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

NABAKISHORE RAJGURU MOHAPATRA Versus THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER RAYAGADA. C.A. 3629/2023 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010205822015. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 9 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 30 November 2015 to 10 April 2026.

On 30 November 2015 the order records: Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Adjourned.
On 9 December 2015 the order records: As prayed, three weeks' time, as a last chance, is granted to the petitioner to cure the defects as pointed out by the Registry. If the defects are not cured within the aforesaid period of three weeks, the special leave petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. Signature Not Verified Digita
On 27 January 2016 the order records: Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to all the respondents for filing counter affidavit. List again on 8.4.2016.
On 8 April 2016 the order records: Despite last opportunity granted, respondents have not filed counter affidavit. Further opportunity is declined. Registry to process the matter for being listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
On 1 May 2023 the order records: 1. We are informed by learned counsels for the parties that pleadings are complete in the matters. 2. Leave granted.
On 1 November 2023 the order records: Learned counsel for respondent No.1 – State has circulated a letter stating therein that since he has recently filed Vaklatnama and he has yet to receive the files from the concerned Department, these matters may be adjourned by two weeks. In view of the above, post these matters on 06.12.2023.
On 10 April 2026 the order records: IA No. 35835/2026 No case to entertain the application for early hearing is made out. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

30 November 2015. Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Adjourned.
9 December 2015. As prayed, three weeks' time, as a last chance, is granted to the petitioner to cure the defects as pointed out by the Registry. If the defects are not cured within the aforesaid period of three weeks, the special leave petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. Signature Not Verified Digita
27 January 2016. Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to all the respondents for filing counter affidavit. List again on 8.4.2016.
8 April 2016. Despite last opportunity granted, respondents have not filed counter affidavit. Further opportunity is declined. Registry to process the matter for being listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
1 May 2023. 1. We are informed by learned counsels for the parties that pleadings are complete in the matters. 2. Leave granted.
1 November 2023. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 – State has circulated a letter stating therein that since he has recently filed Vaklatnama and he has yet to receive the files from the concerned Department, these matters may be adjourned by two weeks. In view of the above, post these matters on 06.12.2023.
4 April 2024. List on 18.07.2024. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR
6 September 2024. Not to be deleted from the notified date i.e., 11.09.2024.
10 April 2026. IA No. 35835/2026 No case to entertain the application for early hearing is made out. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. R. Chandrachud, Mr. Surajit Bhaduri, Mr. Nishant Kumar, Mr. Manu Shanker Mishra, Mr Nishant Kumar, Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Mr. Subratha Satpathy, Mr. Nabab Singh, Ms. Geetanjali, Mr. D. Venkata Krishna, Ms. Geetanjali Das Krishnan, Mr. Dhuli Venkata Krishna Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Varsha Poddar, Mr. Gopal Singh, Ms Varsha Poddar, Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra, Mr. Umakant Misra, Mr. Debabrata Dash, Mr. Niranjan Sahu, Mrs. Prabhati Nayak, Ms. Apoorva Sharma, Mr. Janakalyan Das, Mr. Piyush Agrawal, Mr. Sandeep Devashish Das

Relief Sought & Granted

On 9 December 2015 the order records: If the defects are not cured within the aforesaid period of three weeks, the special leave petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Speed up proceedings Civil appeals Land Land Acquisition

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 10 Apr 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 10 Apr 2026

Next hearing

7 Apr 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 9 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 6 other files in the folder were left out.